Jump to content

Talk:Heliamphora

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Overhaul - Collaboration

[edit]

Thanks User:Denisoliver for getting this started. Thanks also to User:Mgiganteus1 for the work you did on this article recently. Let's see if we can turn it into an FA-quality article.

I propose the following article sections, similar to those used in the Sarracenia article recently:

   * 0 Introduction
   * 1 Morphology and carnivorous mechanism
         o 1.1 Carnivorous mechanism
         o 1.2 Flowers and seeds
   * 2 Range, habitat, and environmental status
   * 3 Classification
   * 4 Botanical history
   * 5 Cultivation
         o 6.1 Propagation
   * 6 Citations
   * 7 References
   * 8 External links

How does this sound? Feel free to make any changes wanted. --NoahElhardt 21:58, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me. I structured it a bit differently in my last few edits before reading this, but it's similar. It required me to add a bit of an intro to the current Characteristics section, which seems unnecessary. Would it look better if I eliminated the Characteristics heading and kept Distribution and Carnivory (or Carnivorous mechanism, whatever seems to fit better) as subheadings of Morphology?
i.e.:
   * 0 Introduction
   * 1 Morphology
         o 1.1 Carnivory
         o 1.2 Flowers and seeds (yet to be done)
   * 2 etc.
What do you think? Finding and paraphrasing information is always easy for me--it's the structure of an article that maintains good flow that always seems to elude me. --Rkitko 07:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The current "Characteristics" sections seems to me to be a rather general overview. I'm inclined to just merge that section with the introduction, as it is pertinent to understanding the genus and is too general for anything else. Your suggested structure seems fine. --NoahElhardt 14:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Heliamphora. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Heliamphora. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:34, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]