Jump to content

Talk:Henry Pering Pellew Crease

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHenry Pering Pellew Crease has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 2, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
July 8, 2007Good article nomineeListed
October 19, 2007Good article reassessmentKept
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 10, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Henry Pering Pellew Crease was appointed British Columbia's first Attorney General by Governor (and ex-HBC Chief Factor) Sir James Douglas?
Current status: Good article

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 16:37, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Followed the 11 steps, so let's see if it's good.Stevecudmore 03:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Judge's Bench Book Notes of Hall Trial

[edit]

These notes may have content useful for this article. --KenWalker | Talk 23:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Failed GA nomination

[edit]

My primary reasons for failing this GA nomination is because the article looks a bit short (I think you could write more about an Attorney General and Supreme Court justice), and also because there are a lack of in-line citations in the article. Please see WP:REF, and take a look at the referencing style of some other GA articles. Nishkid64 (talk) 17:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Passed GA

[edit]

Successful good article nomination

[edit]

I am glad to say that this article which was nominated for good article status has succeeded. This is how the article, as of July 8, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Yes
2. Factually accurate?: Yes
3. Broad in coverage?: Yes
4. Neutral point of view?: Yes
5. Article stability? Yes
6. Images?: Yes

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status. — bobanny 07:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps (kept)

[edit]

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Ruslik 13:20, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]