Talk:Hestercombe House/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll do the usual - make straightforward copyedits as I go and jot notes below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- this ref mentions the fire brigade leasing it in 1953 and it falling into disrepair around this time - helps with chronology and should be added.
Para 3 of House section has no references.
- Last sentence of that section looks lonely all by itself - can it be put onto a para or expanded?
Gardens section has several small paras that could be joined I think.
First sentence of para 3 in lead shouldn't start with "It.."
I get the impression the article needs a bit more filling out material-wise - it just comes across as a bit brief but I can't put my finger on what's missing....
More later.
- Right - that is interesting.
This article needs a location like in the German one.
- Right - that is interesting.
garden section needs expanding - info on Dutch Garden for starters - and some on key plant species used. Some of the German article veers a little too much into general info about Jekyll/Luytens but not much.
Describing Penelope Hobhouse as a "garden writer, designer, lecturer and television presenter" seems a bit effusive - can't we just use 1-2 descriptors?
- I just left a couple of [citation needed] tags - one would be good for the view but I suspect that may be hard...yet is obvious?
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall: