Talk:Hezb-e Islami Gulbuddin
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hezb-e Islami Gulbuddin article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Same as Hezbi Islami
[edit]Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin is not a fundamentalist faction of Hezbi Islami, it's the same party. It has two different names because in 1979, Mohammad Yunus Khalis split from Hekamtyar's group to form his own party also called Hezbi Islami. The two were differentiated as Hezbi Islami (Gulbuddin) and Hezbi Islami(Khalis). The two articles should be merged. Raoulduke47 20:13, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- While not disputing the basic facts in your comment -- that the party forked thirty years ago -- I strongly disagree with your conclusion. No offense, but pleaselook to see how often HIG occurs in the transcripts of the Guantanamo captives versushow infrequently the other faction is mentioned].
- Gulbuddin's faction is mentioned dozens of times. Khalis's, arguably, once. Gulbuddin's is now allied with the Taliban. And, if I am not mistaken, Khalis's with Hamid Karzai. So please explain more fully why a merge would be helpful, rather than confusing?
- You wouldn't merge the articles on the USA and Canada because they were both former British colonies, which shared a common language and some underlying legal forms, would you?
- Cheers! Geo Swan 20:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Er.. Maybe I didn't express myself clearly enough. What I mean is that Hezbi Islami and Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin are the same thing. Khalis faction is different obviously. I'm just puzzled as to why there are two articles about the same organisation. Raoulduke47 18:50, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oh. Okay. Well, do we know that Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin is the same thing as Hezbi Islami? Most of what I know about the groups is from what I read in the Guantanamo transcripts. Almost all the references are to HIG (spelled a dozen different ways). The relatively few places where Hezbi Islami was used I assumed were due to incompetence. I think we should keep two different articles, until we can clarify whether current references to Hezbi Islami really mean HIG.
- Cheers! Geo Swan 20:23, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
As you will. Hezbi islami has indeed called by many names: Hezb-e-islami, Hezb-i-islami Hekmatyar(HIH), Hezbi islami Gulbuddin(HIG) etc... I have no doubt that all these names indicate the same group, but we can wait for confirmation, if you want. Raoulduke47 22:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
revert -- see talk
[edit]I changed the heading back to "Selected..." There was a table -- someone excised it, without explanation. I replaced the table. I think the heading makes sense with the table. Geo Swan (talk) 05:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- Someone changed the section heading from "Selected explanations of the relation between Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin and Guantanamo captives" to "Accused combatant prisoners at Guantanamo". They didn't offer an explanation for this change. I call for a discussion intended to choose an appropriate heading. Geo Swan (talk) 15:54, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Flag?
[edit]Does anyone have a flag for HIG? One website (http://membres.multimania.fr/jolle/afg5.htm) has a sort of banner that HIG used from 1980-1982, but I cannot verify if either this is real or what HIG's new flag looks like. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.176.201.210 (talk) 00:23, 9 October 2010 (UTC) Update: If a British interview is to be believed, Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin still uses a flag of similar nature. (67.176.201.210 (talk) 12:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC))
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Hezb-e Islami Gulbuddin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070814233656/http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2007/07/6b452d3c-a2e0-459e-9ce9-939411d50a04.html to http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2007/07/6B452D3C-A2E0-459E-9CE9-939411D50A04.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080215104313/http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/fs/2002/12535.htm to http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/fs/2002/12535.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311045103/http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2005/65275.htm to http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2005/65275.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:38, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Hezb-e Islami Gulbuddin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717070506/http://tolonews.com/en/afghanistan/235-hezb-e-islami-killed-2-afghans-and-8-foreigners to http://tolonews.com/en/afghanistan/235-hezb-e-islami-killed-2-afghans-and-8-foreigners
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081210075716/http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/fs/37191.htm to https://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/fs/37191.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080227125803/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt/ARB_Transcript_Set_8_20751-21016.pdf to http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt/ARB_Transcript_Set_8_20751-21016.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:01, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Hezb-e Islami Gulbuddin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.lemonde.fr/web/infog/0,47-0@2-3216,54-905049@51-907647,0.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080307071014/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt/ARB_Transcript_Set_11_21662-22010.pdf to http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt/ARB_Transcript_Set_11_21662-22010.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080227124110/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt/ARB_Transcript_Set_10_21352-21661.pdf to http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt/ARB_Transcript_Set_10_21352-21661.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080227124110/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt/ARB_Transcript_Set_10_21352-21661.pdf to http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt/ARB_Transcript_Set_10_21352-21661.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080307071014/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt/ARB_Transcript_Set_11_21662-22010.pdf to http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt/ARB_Transcript_Set_11_21662-22010.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:48, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- C-Class Terrorism articles
- Mid-importance Terrorism articles
- WikiProject Terrorism articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Afghanistan articles
- High-importance Afghanistan articles
- WikiProject Afghanistan articles
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions