Jump to content

Talk:Hidaka Mountains

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hidaka Mountains/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Now Start class given the added sections on geology, glaciation, and lists of peaks and passes. The following needs to be addressed before the article can be considered for B or higher class:
  • How did the range get its name? Who named it and when?
  • The geology and glaciation need expansion and it would be good to have a different reference on geology to provide some balance.
  • A photo or two of the range, either of one or two peaks or a distant view of the peaks would be great.
  • Other section possibilities: fauna and flora. A brief mention is made of animals and plants in the lead section.
  • The external links not already in the references should be checked to see if they indeed can become references.
  • The Paul Hunt full reference and the associated references added by reference tags should be amalgamated into one as it is essentially duplicate info but that's not really a barrier to B class.
  • I'm unable to determine from the current text as to the importance of this mountain range in Japan thus I have left the importance to low. If there is any cultural significance associated with this range or other factors that may highlight its importance in Japan, that should be mentioned.

Please keep in mind that the above suggestions are meant to aid editors in improving the article and are not intended to criticize the efforts of the editors (past and/or future). Thanks to the editors for recent improvements to move it out of stub class. RedWolf (talk) 06:29, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The low importance is an appropriate assessment in my opinion. The area is not very populated and only important in two maybe three cultural aspects:
  1. Is an important area for horse breeding at least in Hokkaido.
  2. It is an important area for the production of sea weed, which is not relevant for the mountain range.
  3. It is a center of Ainu culture, which I can address in the article.
imars (talk) 11:02, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 11:02, 5 June 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 17:53, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hidaka Mountains. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:59, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]