Talk:High School Affiliated to Fudan University
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Stfg, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 10 February 2012. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! |
Assess
[edit]Article needs wikification and should be also written from a neutral point of view. Dahliarose 23:23, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Article needs wikification and a more neutral point of view. Bestenoch (talk) 15:58, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
GOCEreviewed
[edit]I have removed the copy edit tag from the article. It is not worth copy editing the present version, which needs to be completely rewritten to be encyclopedic rather than an advert, and to be based on proper secondary sources. --Stfg (talk) 10:34, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
[edit]I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:13, 15 June 2013 (UTC)