Talk:High Time (film)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on High Time (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140201154005/http://www.jacknearyonline.com/Fabian%20for%20Vitality.htm to http://www.jacknearyonline.com/Fabian%20for%20Vitality.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:29, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Plot not very encyclopedic[edit]
I don't know if someone did a cut-and-paste of some long summary, but this plot does not seem like something from an encyclopedia. "The academic rigors are always fuel for comedy and camaraderie" is someone's opinion, and not just a summary.
I've never seen this film, so I'm not able to say what it's about, but someone should consider toning this plot down to just the story line, and leave out the flowery wording. There are no references in the long section, so it's hard to guess where the plot came from. Karenthewriter (talk) 07:11, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
It's horrible, it's written like an office clerk at a water cooler explaining the plot to their coworkers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.159.247.72 (talk) 07:09, 17 November 2021 (UTC)