Talk:High school subcultures

Semi-Protection?

this article has HUGE pov issues. Maybe ask for semi-protection? it couldn't hurt.

Cliques Section WTF

Is it just me or is that horribly PoV? Preppies are described as "esteemed through the display of fine clothing and expensive tastes in cars and the like. Preppies are despised by none. Overall the best group to be in, though by definition, not everybody can be a preppy." Is it just me or does this -blam- really sound condesending? I personally loath preppies as much as the jocks, because they're just as arrogant...just like the writer of this particular section. The other cliques mentioned in that section aren't exactly neutral, either..

• there...changed
  • neutrality is overrated anyway Chris 04:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Using the suggestion below must take place in order for Wikipedia to retain any respectability as an on-line encyclopedia.

---

The section on psychological and social development of people from subcultures need to be revised. It needs to reference actual theorists and studies to back up it's claims. For instance, Jung is not the best Psychologist to exlain adolescent subcultures; better sources would be Erikson or Allport.

"Debaters: students taking debate and sometimes forensics." There are classes on debate and/or forensics in high school?--droptone 21:02, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

There aren't usually classes, but there are clubs. I think I may edit that part. Shrewdcat 03:57, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

This section is terribly biased.

This section should either be cleaned up or wiped. The section is just a bunch of claims (biased ones by the way). This isn't even globablly accepted.

This article is unencyclopedic in its present state

As has been noted above, this article does not cite any actual sociology or psychology studies on this topic, so it is essentially original research. And I'm pretty sure there have been plenty of sociology or psychology studies on this topic. The "Examples" section in particular is of great concern to me, and additionally there is an overwhelming U.S. bias throughout the entire article.

I am also not sure if this article is allocated appropriately, as there are other articles floating around like Clique, List of subcultures, etc. where this information may better belong.—jiy (talk) 20:58, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

I don't even think that this article should be on wikipedia. Although the writer uses very nice flowery language, the statements are general sterotypes that have absolutely no basis on anything besides the bias of the writer. J.

I can't believe so many people get upset over this! I can say from an exchange student point of view that this pretty much sums High School up. Because I have never gone to a school in my country that was so divided in groups and don’t get me started on all the drama that went on!. Of curse it maybe EXAGGERATED just a little bit , but I read it and it felt like I was back in Minnesota again!

2006 Sweden

This article is cruely the truth

This is how high school was when I went there in the late 70's, and early 80's. My nieces and nephews tell me their stories, and nothing has changed. This is just how it is. It may not be fit for an encyclopedia, but it's just the cold hard truth.

1982 Chicago

PS If you want to make some changes, please don't delete anything you disagree with. Just put your comments in, and leave the others be.

OK, I guess you are going to rip out the subcultures, and put them somewhere else. That's for the good of Wikipedia. I am going to leave you with a quote from Madeline Albright about women. "Those who believe that women would do a better job running the world clearly forgot how it was in high school."

Sure this is the truth, if you consider corny comedy movies an encyclopedic reference. This article is a joke, and this isnt how it is in my school, not even close.--The Corsair 03:09, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Corsair, It's not like every school is the same. This article would work if they cleaned it up big time. Dion 07:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Question

This is so ridiculously stereotypical. Whose highschool is actually like this? It seems like the article is inferring that this is the actuality of every single highschool, and not a stereotypical representation of the various cultures that may been found in highschool. I mean, there are a lot of people I have noted who defy and shun such categorization--not out of a rebellion to "be different", but simply because they were able to socialize, become friends, and share interests with people regardless of what subcultures they were in. I like to call them "decent, reasonable people".

- In Response: We never said people could not fit out of these sub-cultures, all this is is a nice page on wikipedia showing 'stereotypical' views of highschool subcultures. We are not saying these are necessarily at all true.- Sujacal

quote- "We are not saying these are necessarily at all true." So now Wikipedia can contain unverifiable and most possibly false information? This aticle is just degrading the quality of Wikipedia. Delete it, or fix it to conform to an encyclopedic level of sophistication. Amit

The only way this article could be considered "valid" and "research based" is if it was renamed List of High school subcultures as found in popular media. The list of TV and movies would then count as "references". One could then verify each term does in fact exist (though only in tv and movies). But, since that's unlikely, I intend on removing each of the "Examples" here that don't have sources cited (e.g. footnotes). I challenge the authenticity of this article, and per WP:V and WP:CITE the obligation is on those who wish to keep the info to provide sources. Otherwise, it will become a very short stub (not blank, but short). --Rob 21:45, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

I'm (reluctantly) prepared to wait for people to cite sourcee for the trivial material (like Goths, cheerleading etc...). However, hateful stereotypes like "Ghetto" kids being involved in "angry/loud behavior" seems quite unnaceptable to me. Stereotypes are generally wrong, but at least some stereotypes are based on what's somebody has chosen to do (e.g. band, cheerleeding, dressing goth, etc...). When you start stereotyping people based on income, race, religion (see older version of article); and make unverifiable generalized derogitory claims about people in these groups, then you're doing something that I won't stand for, and will remove when I see it. I really don't understand why somebody would write out hateful things about people they don't even know. --Rob 22:44, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Yes, I am inclined to agree with Rob on this point, we need not promote racist or otherwise hateful and unverifiable content such as that. Bahn Mi 22:46, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

All I was saying was that this is how society oftens unfortanatuely depicts them. There can be no denying that 'ghetto-life' is often considered as style of life or 'subculture'. I agree that we change the name of this to 'List of High school subcultures as found in popular media' or something of that sort.- Sujacal (Does anyone have a response to this?... please post it.)

My personal opinion is irrelavent here. The reason I came across this page is because I wanted some general information about what people around me refer to as "high school subculture," because I didn't go to a traditional "high school," and missed that whole experience. For what this article is, it served that purpose quite well, stereotypical as it may be. Yes, if you want to be 100% politically correct, it needs revision, but by nature, subculture nicknames are anything but PC, and frequently derrogatory from the way I've heard them portrayed, especially because of the apparent rivalry between some of these subcultures. In any case, regardless of how it is classified, edited, or revised, this information is part of human culture and history, and should be documented for those who want to learn about it, such as myself, even if it is limited to certain locals, such as American Culture, High School Culture, etc. The idea and explanation should not be deleted even if this particular page is, but deleting it before a suitable replacement is posted is a mistake.

My high school, for the most part is like this. Theres jocks, gangstas, preppies (me), emos, skaters, and goths. This article descrives it pretty well. Guanaco152003 12:56, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

I don't know who made the page but this is complete bull. Personally I find it HIGHLY offensive. Just look at the cheerleader caption, "A stereotypical cheerleader is viewed as being dumb. Usually she is someone who is very sweet and not very threatening to the other groups." Cheerleaders are defended in this statement which is onlya bout half true. There are very many mean cheerleaders. What upsets me however is the fact that cheerleaders are defended but there is nothing for anyone else. There is no "Nerds while badly sterotyped are generally good people" nor is there any, "Goths while badly sterotyped are most of the time simply kids that are lost" or "Stoners while sterotyped as being lazy and worthless are many times incredibly smart and are looking for a form of release like sports are to jocks." This article needs to be fixed because anyone not part of the popular "in-crowd" is depicted in this article as a lesser person.

-While I do not find this article offensive, there is a flagrant bias in the unbalanced descriptions. This is entertaining, but certainly very un-encyclopedic. Note the line about Sluts not being able to control their "biological impulses." Undersea

Unverifiable information will be removed

Please provide reliable sources for information here, specifically for each and every term included. I plan on doing a large scale "pruning", along the lines of what I already did for Secondary education in the United States. If somebody indicates that they are actively researching this, and wishes more time, please indicate here, so I'll back off, and give you a fair opportunity. For now, I can tolerate some of the less harmful stereotypes (e.g. the ones not involving ethnic/religious attacks), but ultimately everythning needs verification (not just that somebody used the word, but that it's widely used, and has the meaning we say it does). --Rob 22:09, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

• Why don't you help source the material? -- JJay 02:42, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

• First, I'll say you did a great job with sourcing (again), and have avoided a need of mass removal. I do go to great lengths to source material that is signficant, relevant, likely true, and likely to have relialbe sources. I don't think stereotyping fits this criteria. So, my sourcing attentions are directed elsewhere. Also, I don't cleanup/improve as many education related articles as I used to, as I've grown a little frustrated at article creators who don't make any effort in their creations, and I'm less inclined to improve things after them. I've made more effot lately to try and get the editors who add info to actually add their sources, as generally they aught to know. --Rob 05:23, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

• Ok, that's cool. I need more time to source all the terms, probably a week or so. But they are very widely used and if I can't verify through a good source I'll remove them myself. It would be nice if people added references when adding material to an article, but one of the issues here is that we already have individual articles on most of the terms. That sort of gives them de facto verifiability. -- JJay 05:48, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Links with Scene (youth) and Youth culture

Links with Scene (youth), particularly Youth culture - should this be merged with Youth culture? -- Paul foord 09:54, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Separate list

Could you please explain why you removed the terms from this article without discussion. Particularly given that I am working on providing references for the article. -- JJay 22:42, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Current placement of the list is poor (with too much bolding) - it would be better placed at the end of the article or given the length of the list a separate list created. The format and placement of the list unbaslances the article. The article should probably go merge into Youth culture, another relatively poorly written article. It is in fact a subset of that. -- Paul foord 23:27, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Edited to address some of above, note some of the articles that this should refer to need some work. -- Paul foord 04:42, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Your edits seem good to me. However, I don't think the merge idea is appropriate at this time as many of the terms are very specific to the school environment and can not translate to youth culture. I also need to finish sourcing the article before any change can be contemplated. -- JJay 09:36, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Ethnicities

I'm moving this to talk page as I don't think ethnic groupings qualify as a national or international subculture. -- JJay 04:30, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

• ABCs (American-Born Chinese) and FOBs (Fresh Off the Boat): Two different subcultures of Asian-American students. Despite their name, ABCs are neither exclusively American-born nor are they only of Chinese ancestry, as many are members of other East Asian ethnicities. They are usually the children of established Asian immigrants while FOBs are newer arrivals. FOBs identify mainly with East Asian popular culture and are stereotyped as speaking English poorly. Depending on the school, the two can be close allies or bitter enemies.

I don't see anything wrong with the above paragraph that JJay took out. In some schools, these ethnic subcultures play a much greater role than the traditional jocks vs preps vs nerds vs goths, etc. For example: NYC. My HS had the Asian-wear-black-shop-at-J-crew group, and the Academic-Indians group, etc, as well as the Asian-and-like-to-speak-in-their-native-language group. There is also the Korean-super-religious group who all knew each other from church before they came to high school. lol love nuggets — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.92.53.195 (talk) 00:28, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Cleanup request

I don't see enough wrong with the article for it to need a cleanup request at the top. There are seem small typo and grammar type errors, but what? -- Mac Davis] ☢ ญƛ. 07:57, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Unverifiable information, highly stereotypical.

"track jacket jews" is pretty funny. does this have any possibility of a citation anywhere? Like even urban dictionary? --67.161.93.159 08:14, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

We had Jocks, Nerds, and Stoners in my day. There were 1500 white male boys. About 1000 were stoners, 450 were jocks, and 50 were nerds. I was a nerd. It was sad how even the teachers were so sadistic to us. Now I am in fantastic shape, and I just feel pity for the others.

Thanks for your life story, I was going to ask about it, but you got to it first. Yes wikipedia is really the place to look back on a pitiful high-school life... Lordofchaosiori 23:31, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

What's pitiful is they put up a wall for the deceased alumni, and it looks like the one in D.C. for the Viet Nam war. Most of the dead were from drug overdoses, car accidents, fights, etc. Wikipedia should be the place to truthfully describe the high school experience.

Mean Girls

Whoever wrote this article has been watching Mean Girls too many times. This isn't even close to NPOV. This needs to be cleaned up, fast.

A lot of adults in the theater were laughing, but my nieces didn't think it was funny. It was like a documentary to them.

Send them to a new school, then. Alot of places arent like this. This article is something from a satire movie or videogame. (The nerd pic is from the Sims, isnt it...) Oh, and please sign your comments..--The Corsair 03:19, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Redirected

This article only talks about "high school" subcultures. What about middle school and college? This whole idea of having jocks, nerds, preps, and punks eating at different lunch tables starts in middle or late elementary school. Some of these cliques can be found in college, too. I made a new article called "Adolescent stereotypes." It is the same text as this article, edited to contain references to middle and junior high school. Labeling and joining cliques is not strictly limited to high school.

Sorry but high school is the most important and that is the focus of this article. You should never redirect a page like this without discussion. Youth culture may be what you are looking for. Also please sign your posts. -- JJay 02:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Wowser.

I'm not sure if this page should be cleaned up or deleted. Cleaning up may be analogous to restoring a Mini after a head-on collision with a semi.

I attend a suburban high school, and find this page quite inaccurate - simply put, there is no easy way to define a high school demographic with clear boundaries.

I don't know where you went to HS, but in mine we had our cliques, groups, and clubs. With them you were either in, or you were so out!

Great.

I dont agree with anyone else on this topic. It is part of Sociology, and alot of things on here dont fit into, "encyclopedia." Thats why I come to this site, it has all kinds of articles on everything. I use it when I am writing stories, books, or just want to know something. The topic describes every high school stereotype. The sad thing most of them are true. Maybe if people changed there wouldnt be stereotypes. Still humanity has its head shoved in ignorance. Thus, topics like this, which I find funny, exist. Most people at my high school enjoy labels. I dont see it in any way vulgar. If everyone learned to just chill and be apathetic to things liek this then the world would be a much better place.

Don't give up on it

Much as I agree the article is a total mess, if it were only tidied up and the rubbish was taken out it would be great. Consequently I have done some work on the first few sections - the change is a little dramatic if you compare it but it is required if it is to get cleaned up. --BenyG 23:56, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

• You may have taken out too much. It seems a little spare now and some of those details may have been important. Keep working on it though. -- JJay 01:42, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Too many subcultures

The cliques and subcultures on the list should be confined too common and obvious subcultures found in every school. Terems thet you or your firend has come up with should NOT be on the list. Half of the cultures should be deleted.

Religious

I am a high school student and find that this compilation is accurate in most cases, despite the fact that many of these subcultures are absent from my high school (which has an enrollment of around 250). But now to the point: what about the devoutly religious students? I know that they are a group here in Arkansas, but is it the same way other places? Should they be included on the list? Thudgens 04:11, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Probably, yes, as that is a growing youth subculture as well. Fisheromen 03:04, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments

This article is actually somewhat useful, as most of the stereotypes described here DO exist in some capacity, particularly in the US and UK. However, maybe that should be added to the title of the article, so that this is clearer. Also, it needs cleanup, and there are too many broad generalizations that should be addressed... for instance, saying that most female athletes have older brothers, which may be entirely untrue and was only true in the author's own experience. Fisheromen 03:04, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

never heard the term soccer thug being used in my life. i think the person means a casual or hooligan.

This article...

Has got to be one of the funniest and uncyclopedic things I've read in wikipedia, it presents these groups in the eyes of a teenager, however that's not to say this article is incorrect, in fact most, if not all, of this article is fact. Lordofchaosiori 23:27, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Oh and this (Teenage mothers: Pregnant teenagers. Frequently seen as outcasts by other school groups. Another stereotype is that they have really bad fathers/boyfriends. The teenage father is considered to be a spin-off of this group. This qroup generally consists of Latinos.) is horribly racist, so racist in fact, I laughed for a long time. (I'm latino.) Lordofchaosiori 23:40, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Stereotypes usually contain a great deal of truth.

No, stereotypes contain a great deal of stupidity. And, please, sign your comments, even if you want to be anonymous, someone could find out who wrote whatever it is you say with the history.. --The Corsair 03:16, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

You're an asshole -- how's that for a stereotype. Sheesh. -- Chris 19:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

another overlap group

in my high school the drug dealers sold drugs to all the other groups. therefore overlapping.

seriously tho the labels and groups section seems far too tedious and long to me. if a source can be found that would lump these all into a reasonable number of categories, and then listed under the categories, i think it would help this article in its presentation.Lenn0r 00:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Usually when somebody is selling drugs, they are their own best customer. Sometimes I would go to the home of one of these kids wondering how the parents could not know. It turns out the parents were on the junk too!

This is a good idea. (cmt referred to idea on presentation, not last above cmt.)Fisheromen 01:46, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

worst article on wikipedia

this destroys any credibility this wiki even attempts to establish. I can't believe it wasn't quick-deleted when it was first made. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.115.40.127 (talk • contribs)

The original list of subcultures was much better, but this is NOT the place for such detail. These stereotypes do exist, but a general view of them would be much better than what has been, and is currently present. Stating that there are problems because of the cliques is essential, but the way it is now is laughable.

This is the worst article on wikipedia. Its tone makes it seem that a person is a 'nerd', or a 'dork', or a jock. These are labels and with everything, there are degrees. The 'overlap' is ridiculous also. Any person who does not know the truth about American (all this article talks about) high schools would be seriously misled by the article. It should be deleted. 64.149.153.125 00:41, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

My 2 cents

My two cents: worthless, but still shiny and worth a look. This is a poorly written article, and requires a assload of cleanup. But it's not a bad article. I read through this and, being a current high school student, have to say that most of these groups are real, and the explanations are for the most part right. I'm going to take it my liberty to weed out the ones that are like... stupid... but for the most part this is a real article. And i'm guessing whoever's like "DIS IS A HORRIBLE ARTIKLE" is saying it because it told you the truth about your subculture. Proud defiant of all subcultures

Uncyclopedia...

This would make a good article for Uncyclopedia, considering 80% of their articles are crap! 205.188.116.6 07:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Robotics

After noticing the growing trend of the various FIRST robotics competitions within the last decade (there are over 100,000 thousand students involved in the various FIRST competitions as of 2006), and the vast majority of them have their own subculture in their high schools. Therefore, it was added to the list. -Art 18:37 1 September 2006

Doomed

This article shows why my generation is DOOMED!!! 205.188.116.6 22:51, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Too many subcultures:

Basically this article can boil down to 10 subcultures:

1. Jocks/Cheerleaders- people who play sports all the time and get all the ladies 2. Preps - the materialistic people 3. Smart people- smart people who have social skills and a life 4. Nerds - losers 5. Goths 6. Punks/Skaters 7. Emos 8. Posers - wanna be emos/punks/goths 9. Wiggers - wanna be ganstas 10. Unlabeled, or share groups

Actually it could be boiled down to 6 subcultures: 1. Jocks/Cheerleaders- people who play sports all the time and get all the ladies 2. Preps - the materialistic people 3. Smart people- smart people who have social skills and a life 4. Nerds - losers 5. Countercultures - Goths, Punks/Skaters, Emos, Wiggers, Posers (poser being a judgement call on how counterculture they are), 6. Unlabeled, or share groups

I know many nerds that have become an immense success in life. I am one of them. Oh, and two of my best friends, who I loved like brothers, were JOCKS!

Secondary Schools in New Zealand

I don't see such sharp division among cliques in New Zealand's high schools. Having been there before, I can say usually the best "jocks" aren't the worst students academically in many schools. In fact, I do know many instances where at schools such as Auckland Grammar School the school dux (class valediction) was also a member of First XI Cricket or even Captain of First XV Rugby.

This is beyond gay.

Delete this putrid pile of bullcrap. Seriously, this has no relevance. I stumbled upon this piece of crap after searching for something else. This is beyond retarded. This sounds like the sort of drivvle some frustrated, mentally retarded 14 year old would create. It reeks of idiocy. DELETE THIS PILE OF CRAP!

Emotional much? -- Chris 19:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Wow. Is it really necessary to cuss? Dion 07:27, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

This article is so racist

This article only identifies white-majority subcultures, totally excluding other races. Basically, only white groups are ever mentioned.

Ok. 1. If you know some stereotypes from other races, feel free to add them. That's what Wiki's all about. 2. Try not to cuss. You have no idea how many kids run around Wikipedia everyday. Dion 07:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Hey!

Using the N word is racist too. It needs major clean up. a few months ago it was fine but someone screwed it up!

Summary of problems

Having lived in several countries, and being involved in education for many years, I can sum up this article as it stands to being a list of the larger cliques in white middle class American High Schools. It is also divisive and discriminatory, and fails to be NPOV. Johnpf 04:05, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Removed descriptions of each clique

It had too many pastel boxes (for verifibility, POV, etc), so it's been shrunk into a list. Will ^{(Glaciers melting in the dead of night)} 12:21, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm sure I'm preaching to the choir here...

..but this article has no reason for even existing on Wikipedia.

Nothing in it is based on fact. Since when were highschool cliques subcultures?

- "Prep" is a derogatory term created by teenagers to insult spoilt rich kids. "Jock" is a stereotype. "Nerd" is a stereotype. "Band geek" is another derogatory term. - Goth as a subculture has nothing to do with school life. Mos teenage "goths" are just emotional kids who think they're "dark". This has nothing to do with the culture itself. - Hip-hoppers exists outside of school. So do stoners. - Normal teenagers? What the HELL is that one about? The people who involve themselves in the other groups aren't "normal"?

This article should either be renamed "Highschool Stereotypes", to more accurately reflect it's content, or be wiped from the face of Wikipedia. It's been up for vote for deletion twice on Wikipedia so far. That should say enough.

- 19:26 29th October, 2006

How could you guys forget about gang members? Don't you go to public school? I'm not going to say who is typically in these gangs or I might offend someone.

This article is ignorant

Why is "greasers" in the list? And who replaced Hip Hop with "Gang members"? being a gang member is not a high school subculture, since real "gangster" kids would be in juvenile. It's not fitting for this article, therefore it should be replaced back with whatever term that preceded it.

Edit: To the guy above my comment, we didn't forget about gang members, a person implied something similar before and I replaced it with something more appropriate. There's a BIG difference between a real gang member and a poser who only imitates what a stereotypical thug would dress and act like. Don't encourage them by calling them gangsters.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bélancourt (talk • contribs) 17:10, 11 December 2006 (UTC).

Globalisation

It might be better if this article were retitled "high school subculture in the USA". You cannot have an article with global coverage called "high school subculture" as such terminology is not used globally. From my UK viewpoint "highschool subculture" is a term which relates exclusively to the USA (and possibly Canada). In the UK our senior schools are generally known as secondary schools but we would never talk about "secondary school subculture" or even "school subculture", though we would use the terms "youth culture" and "youth subculture", both of which are already the subject of Wikipedia articles. We would however never use the term "highschool subculture" to talk about the subculture in UK secondary schools. In any case many of the terms used in this article (or at least the ones I know about in the UK, such as chav, Goth, emo, etc) are not confined to school pupils. Many of them leave school at 16 but they still belong to the same subcultures after they've left school. Alternatively perhaps this article should be abandoned altogether and the relevant sections should be included in the youth culture and youth subculture articles. You could instead just have a simple listing of articles under the heading "High school subculture in the USA". Dahliarose 10:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Name Change?

This article made me laugh. Whoever changed it really has no clue about the sub-cultures in school. For example, the definition for alternative kids, truly belongs in the definition of indie kids. Not to mention that this is a very biased article. I believe the article name should be changed to High-school stereotypes/cliques, some, like nerd, are stereotypes, whereas indie or others may be true cliques. Interpolarity 23:55, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

funny...

This makes me laugh... Actually....not just laugh... It makes me crack up... Its funny how all the cliques are described.... Also..How they named ALL these was funny... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by *Kiki*Krazy* (talk • contribs) 00:22, 10 March 2007 (UTC).

Reason for redirect to Youth subculture

This article has been redirected to Youth subculture because it duplicated much of the content in that article (and also duplicated content in List of youth subcultures. Another reason is that the High school subcultures article was poorly-written, mostly unencyclopedic and United States-centric. If you feel that there is some content worth saving, please add it to the appropriate section in the Youth subculture article. Spylab 00:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

The consensus was to merge content. I see little to no content overlap here, so a redirection is effectively a WP:deletion by redirection. There was no consensus to do that. Wbm1058 (talk) 19:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

I have again redirected this unencyclopedic article to youth subculture because it duplicated much of the content in that article (and also duplicated content in List of youth subcultures. Other reasons are that the High school subcultures article was poorly written, US-centric and full of unreferenced opinions (other than parts of the list that unnecessarily duplicated List of youth subcultures). If you feel that there is some referenced and relevant content worth saving, please add it to the appropriate section in the youth subculture article or to list of subcultures.Spylab (talk) 04:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)