Talk:Hippolyte Bayard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Biography Assessment Drive

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 14:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 [edit]

The text on the back of Bayard´s photo differs to the one shown in the french version of this subject. Revision needed.

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:41, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lace glove[edit]

Is this image Bayard's? Dated circa 1840. Seems fishy to me, definitely interesting if it was really one of his works. OrganicEarth (talk) 00:51, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Self portrait as a drowned man[edit]

Anybody good with formatting? The Verso text appears in the wrong section.TerryToogood (talk) 17:36, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Process description given in Historic Camera site is more complete[edit]

The description of the process differs from that given in Historic Camera, which follows:

The process itself was relatively straightforward. First, the paper was treated with sodium chloride. After drying, the paper was submerged in silver nitrate to create silver chloride, which is sensitive to light. The paper was then exposed to light until it turned black, washed, dried, and then stored in a portfolio until needed. Before the paper could be used, it had to be saturated in potassium iodide, placed into the camera, and then received light exposure. After being treated in sodium thiosulfate and placed in a bath of ammonia and water, a positive photographic image would appear on the paper.

RPSM (talk) 12:32, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bayard's process was not called "direct positive process"[edit]

Early life and career[edit]

While working as a civil servant, Bayard experimented with photography. He developed his own method of producing photos called the direct positive process.[1]

Direct positives in the camera are produced by a number of processes eg the daguerreotype, tintype, Kodachrome and other transparency films. Direct positive paper prints too - the Metropolitain museum will classify direct positive prints in the camera as direct positives as a class of images. Bayard did not call his process by any particular name, as there was no commercial activity involved in selling and marketing it. There is direct positive paper marketed by Ilford today for using in large cameras without the expense of film. RPSM (talk) 12:58, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hippolyte Bayard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:03, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chevalier[edit]

Can we have a better version of the photo of Chevalier? Surely Bayard did not cut out the original and paste it on a Photoshop gradient. Here we're trying to represent an artist's work authentically. President Lethe (talk) 21:24, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]