Talk:Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

University of California Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Merge?[edit]

Shouldn't the articles for "Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences" and "Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences" be merged, since they're both talking about the same academic journal (the name changed in 2008)? I would think the resulting article should be under the journal's most current name (Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences). ——Rich jj (talk) 16:48, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]