Talk:Historiography of the Battle of France

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Historiography of the Battle of France article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

European history Mid‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Historiography / British / European / French / German / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military historiography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Refs[edit]

Are we using sfn's or <ref> refs? RegardsKeith-264 (talk) 07:19, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend < ref > format. that way you get the key info in one place. Rjensen (talk) 17:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer sfns, they're less long-winded.Keith-264 (talk) 18:09, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

they are less useful to people who actually use them (most people ignore them, say publishers). Rjensen (talk) 18:19, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They're much quicker if you're paraphrasing a long passage and using quite a few.Keith-264 (talk) 18:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]