Talk:History of Barcelona

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Franquism[edit]

The section on Franquism needs editing. Currently:

While the use of Catalan in private was tolerated in the later years of the dictatorship, the immigrants to Barcelona spoke only Spanish. Catalan-language education was unavailable, even if there had been any social pressure to learn the local language (which was far from the case in urban areas).

Two American bloggers (Iberian Notes and Kalebeul) have documented the survival of publishing in Catalan in Barcelona throughout the dictatorship, and adverts for theatre shows in Catalan exist starting in the late 1940s. There is also considerable anecdotal evidence of the spoken use of Catalan in university education during the 1950s. The suggestion that it only began to reemerge in private towards the end is completely absurd.

The number of left-leaning Spanish immigrants who learned Catalan and thrived post-Franco makes a nonsense of the second statement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.88.64.80 (talk) 15:06, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish Barchinona[edit]

I do not understand the statement "The Jewish population of Barchinona was considerable enough under the reign of Wamba (672–680) to demand a royal edict to expel the Sefardim." What meaning could "Sefardim" have in the seventh century? Needs to be expanded or deleted (it is also unreferenced). Languagehat (talk) 14:56, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content. Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 16:04, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Barcelona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:48, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Forbidden, but not illegalised?[edit]

Under Franco, the use of the Catalan language in public life was suppressed and forbidden, although its use was not formally illegalised as often claimed.

What is the difference between forbidden and (strange word) 'illegalised'? Valetude (talk) 10:41, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed "Illegalise" (or "illegalize") is an unusual word, but it is a word, according to Wiktionary and to Merriam-Webster, both of which give recent examples of its use. I wrote most of the article in its present form, but I did not write that particular passage. Per your question, I think it needed clarification, so I've changed it to "was suppressed and effectively forbidden, although its use was not formally criminalised as often claimed." Thanks. Carlstak (talk) 12:52, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]