Talk:History of Singapore/GA1
Appearance
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Commencing GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 11:39, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- References 2, 18, 9, 44, 35, 54, 49, 55, 46, and 14 are no longer active. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 12:35, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
- Well written. Minor problems with phrasing were corrected.
- b (MoS):
- Conforms to manual of style. Overlinking was a problem in this article but has been reduced per WP:OVERLINK.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
- The article is fairly well referenced. However, a number of references are no longer active (see above). As these were fairly minor sources it has not been seen necessary to fail the article - but they must be fixed asap, by either resource the material or removing it from the article. Additionally, some sections were heavily reliant upon a single source, especially the early history of Singapore. These sections would benefit from the introduction of alternative and complimentary references.
- b (citations to reliable sources):
- Citations are to third party publications.
- c (OR):
- No evidence of OR.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its scope.
- a (major aspects):
- Addresses major aspect of article subject matter.
- b (focused):
- Remains focused. No digressions.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy:
-
- No issues concerning POV evident.
-
- It is stable:
- No edit wars etc.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Images are properly tagged and justified.
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images are accompanied by contextual captions.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Keep/Delist: KEEP ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 15:05, 18 February 2010 (UTC)