Talk:History of Southern Vectis

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the History of Southern Vectis redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Isle of Wight Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Isle of Wight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of the Isle of Wight in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Isle of WightWikipedia:WikiProject Isle of WightTemplate:WikiProject Isle of WightIsle of Wight-related articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations

This article and Southern Vectis[edit]

I have created this article mainly to help sort out the split in history sections on the main Southern Vectis article. It still needs a lot of work but I think it is a good starting point for the history of the company. Editor5807^speak 10:14, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has proposed this for deletion because "topic is better covered in the Southern Vectis article, and this both duplicates and misses out a lot of the content and makes Wikipedia harder to maintain". To preserve the history of contributions that may have been merged back there, I am redirecting it back to the main article. – Fayenatic London 17:01, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Route Rouge logo.gif[edit]

The image Image:Route Rouge logo.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

Image:Sv logo.PNG

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --20:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]