Jump to content

Talk:History of Stoke City F.C.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleHistory of Stoke City F.C. is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 16, 2008.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 11, 2007Good article nomineeListed
September 17, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 6, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Stoke City F.C. is the second-oldest English football league club, as it was founded in 1863?
Current status: Featured article

GA comments

[edit]

This article is very, very good (in my opinion) and incredibly well referenced. I will pass as a good article and suggest the following for FAC, this isn't far off...

  • WP:DASH is applied to seasons, so instead of 1984-85, use 1984–85.
  • Reduction in repetitive use of references, particularly ref [1] which could be used once per para. Same for [4], [5], [8], [11]. I realise that some people think that everything needs reference (I suffered the same fate in Adam Gilchrist, but it looks a bit silly to reference every sentence of a single para in the same way.
  • Use of "around" instead of c. - reads better.

Good work. The Rambling Man 17:06, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Long sentence

[edit]

"Tom Mather was appointed manager later in 1923 although Stoke were unable to mount another promotion challenge and were relegated from the Second Division four years later in the 1925–26 season." Could benefit from a break somewhere. J.Winklethorpe talk 22:22, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've split to: "Tom Mather was appointed manager later in 1923 although Stoke were unable to mount another promotion challenge. They were instead relegated from the Second Division four years later in the 1925–26 season." Dave101→talk  15:27, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stoke City: Cumulative goal difference graph

[edit]

I've made another graph for the History of Stoke City F.C. page. It needs tidying up a bit before "going live": the managerial tenure dates need to be made more accurate (I can get them from SoccerBase) and I think the manager's name tags can be aligned better. These things can be fixed quite easily but I wanted to get some feedback from you all before doing any more work on it.--Payo (talk) 12:36, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graph showing the cumulative goal difference of Stoke CIty F.C. in Football League competitions 1997-2008 under different managers

Protection

[edit]

Can somebody please protect this page? Edits such as these are not befitting a featured article appearing on the Main Page. --Candlewicke  :) Sign/Talk 16:15, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely. Pages featured on the main page are rarely protected. Usually only in cases of heavy and severe vandalism. Latics (talk) 22:17, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know but that was pretty bad. What was worse was it seemed to have been there for some time. --Candlewicke  :) Sign/Talk 10:46, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non sequitur

[edit]

"The club joined the Football League upon its formation in 1888, making them the second oldest club in the Football League." This sentence doesn't seem to make sense to me, but I don't know enough about the subject to rephrase it in a way that explains what's really meant. I assume it means that Stoke were the second oldest (ie second earliest founded) of the clubs that joined the league on its formation. But that doesn't, per se, make them "the second oldest club in the Football league". Surely it's not actually relevant (to the point being made) that Stoke joined the league on its formation? If another club with more ancient roots had joined later and was still in the league today, they'd still be an "older club in the league" than Stoke, wouldn't they? Russ London (talk) 21:04, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The image Image:Stokecity1972leaguecup.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 24 external links on History of Stoke City F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:15, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Stoke City F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:18, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on History of Stoke City F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:36, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of Stoke City F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:59, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Stoke City F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_Stoke_City_F.C.&oldid=1205326991"