Talk:History of biological warfare

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2018 and 14 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hcmaller.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on History of biological warfare. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Used by the British during the American revolution[edit]

"A British officer sent 300 smallpox-infected blankets to the rebel plantations during the Yorktown campaign of 1781, and the British may deliberately have used smallpox as a weapon of war in other instances.38 Apart from Fort Pitt in 1763, however, no other cases of the deliberate use of smallpox against Indians have been recorded."[1]Doug Weller talk 13:54, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See discussion at Talk:Biological warfare. Whizz40 (talk) 20:03, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of biological warfare. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Caffa[edit]

In 2011 Valerius Tygart describing the siege of Caffa added "... defending forces retreated, followed by the conquest of the city by the Mongols". The first cited source says "Janibeg renewed the siege in 1345 but was again forced to lift it after a year, this time by an epidemic of plague that devastated his forces." Another source (not a good-looking one) says "Janibeg had no choice but to call off his siege ..." so I'm wondering whether the retreat-and-conquest bit has solid sourcing. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 18:11, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There was no response so I removed the sentence. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 18:32, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arrows in the Dirt[edit]

"English Longbowmen ... stuck their arrows into the ground in front of them.... the dirt and soil was likely to stick to the arrowheads, thus making the wounds much more likely to become infected." Citation? Was this intentional bio warfare or just happenstance? Before germ theory, how would the archers know this? Would an arrow stuck in the dirt be any dirtier than an arrow carried in a wood/leather quiver and handled with dirty hands? Would a surgeon treating an arrow wound know whether this specific arrow carried germs from the dirt or just germs from everyday life? Did someone write about this practice at the time, or was it something modern scholars came up because it sounds cool? Mooseman2 (talk) 15:30, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]