Talk:History of serfdom

Middle Ages Mid‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Economics

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Abolition in England and Wales[edit]

The article states: 'In England, the end of serfdom began with the Peasants' Revolt in 1381. It had largely died out in England by 1500 as a personal status, and was fully ended when Elizabeth I freed the last remaining serfs in 1574.[5]' However, if one goes to the source given and reads it carefully, it emerges that in 1574 Elizabeth I freed the remaining serfs on her own estates, not generally or without exception in England and Wales. These are two different things. Norvo (talk) 22:15, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Russia[edit]

The article had only a few words about Russia-- which is the largest case in terms of number of serfs and in terms of depth of the historiography. So I added a brief overview with links and new citations. Rjensen (talk) 12:13, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of serfdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130527113728/http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Serfdom to http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Serfdom

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional work used as source[edit]

Citation 6, "Le Roi de Fer" by Maurice Druon is a work of fiction. It is historical fiction, but it does not provide evidence that "Serfdom was de facto ended in France by Philip IV, Louis X (1315), and Philip V (1318)"

Heyday section[edit]

Am I alone in finding the section title "Heyday" a bit unserious? It's a term associated with phenomena far less serious and less brutal than a form of slavery. I would suggest "Prevalence" or "Zenith", or perhaps the historical era with which the section is concerned? Just a thought. Matuko (talk) 18:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I'll retitle as "Prevalence" unless you have another idea for it :•) — I'ma editor2022 ^{(🗣️💬 |📖📚)} 21:09, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inadequate Lead?[edit]

The lead doesn't summarize the contents of the article, is unnecessarily short, and doesn't follow MOS guidelines for lead section. I would appreciate if someone could expand the lead section from just a few words. — I'ma editor2022 ^{(🗣️💬 |📖📚)} 21:06, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]