Talk:History of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth (1569–1648)

History of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth (1569–1648) has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 12, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Poland High‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lithuania Mid‑importance

	Lithuania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Belarus Mid‑importance

	Belarus portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Ukraine Mid‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: History Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

European history Mid‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cossack uprisings[edit]

"Cossack uprising" would be a disambiguation page. "Cossack uprisings" serves as a list of uprisings. Orczar (talk) 13:54, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

B class[edit]

During the B-class review for WikiProject Poland, I determined that the article seems to me to meet the criteria for the B-class. A WP:GA nomination could be considered. Good job! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:09, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:History of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth (1569–1648)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ajh1492 (talk) 16:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs some work before it becomes a Good Article.

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
see below

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Passed

Comments
This is going to take a couple passes to get through due to the size of the subject matter. Ajh1492 (talk) 21:58, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Lede needs to better summarize the subject matter, for this length (and complexity) of material I'd expect 2X larger.
You really want to put references in the Lede? The Lede is supposed to be just a summary of points covered in the article.
You might want to have a set of see also tags throughout the article.
"Unexpectedly, Henry of Valois ended up a winner." - How was it unexpected?
Clunky transition from Henry Valois to discussing the elected kings - you might want to move that paragraph to the top of the section.

MORE TO COME Ajh1492 (talk) 21:58, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've addressed the above concerns. Orczar (talk) 22:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What's the status on this review? The more to come was written several weeks ago and nothing has happened since. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 19:55, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The review is still active, it's a big and complex article. Ajh1492 (talk) 12:43, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Passed! Ajh1492 (talk) 12:12, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What's with the en-dash?[edit]

Is there some reason why this and related articles use an en-dash instead of a hyphen, for "Polish–Lithuanian"? This seems to be an error. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 05:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]