Talk:History of the Puritans under King James I

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Anglicanism / Reformed Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Low-importance).
	Reformed Christianity portal This article is supported by WikiProject Reformed Christianity.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is not an encyclopedic entry. This is a biased piece of propaganda. Whilst there is no harm in the use of arguement to put forward a viewpoint. It has no place in an encyclopaedia like Wikipedia. This article is entirely biased and misleading given the lack of balance. It needs to be substantially rewritten such that I would suggest it in fact needs deleting and rewriting — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.111.99.181 (talk) 11:39, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citations needed[edit]

Very interesting article which I believe is historically accurate. However, it completely lacks citations and references.Yeoberry (talk) 02:42, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]