Talk:History of the concept of creativity

Other perspectives

Most of the content in this article came from Tatarkiewicz, a Polish author (see ref on page). His take on it seems comprehensive, but is from a particular perspective. Note, for example, this sentence:

Finally, at long last, someone ventured to use the word, "creation." He was the 17th-century Polish poet and theoretician of poetry, Maciej Kazimierz Sarbiewski (1595-1640), known as "the last Latin poet."

Anyone who has any knowledge or has done any reading on this topic is welcome to contribute - particularly anything that is not so euro-centric. Do any of the eastern religions or philosophies, for example, have anything to say about the concept of creativity? --BrettRob 02:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Adding to this page

If you make any significant additions to this page, please add a summary sentence or two to the History section on the Creativity page. Likewise, if you have added anything to the history section on the Creativity page, please mirror or expand on it here. --BrettRob 02:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

I have a suggestion - that this page be merged into the main Creativity folder. This article is based on one author who has a particular take on what creativity is, and its history. Frankly, I'm not convinced he's authoritative . (It doesn't help that it claims the first use of the word "creation" as being by a Polish author.) There are a few chapters and journal articles out there, but I'm not sure the subject is established enough to have a page in its own right.VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 13:22, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of the concept of creativity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060625103711/http://wwwcsi.unian.it/educa/curriculum/vita_jdn.html to http://wwwcsi.unian.it/educa/curriculum/vita_jdn.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:58, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Page Sources and Other worldviews

As BrettRob has pointed out, this page needs an increase in sources, especially in its introduction, as well as the history of creativity from the viewpoints of non western regions. I will try to make some edits in the next few weeks regarding the subject, but if anyone knows any good sources for me or other editors to read, that would be fantastic. Mojotjejen (talk) 16:47, 17 October 2019 (UTC) 16:42, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

To be going on with: Weiner's (2000) book Creativity & Beyond is good on western development (but imho not so good on contemporary issues). For Eastern creativity there is a lot less (partly because the cult of the creative individual is a particularly western cultural development), but Niu and Sternberg's article "The Philosophical Roots of Western and Eastern Conceptions of Creativity" is good. OsFish (talk) 06:31, 24 October 2019 (UTC)