Talk:History of women in linguistics
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Changes I made to the draft
[edit]@Fleur Dierickx Can you explain the reasoning behind your revert of my edits? There was no explanation provided so I remain confused. The Tone content tag was because of paragraphs like this Meanwhile, those female linguistic contributions that have not fully slipped into obscurity should be regarded separately from a more general history of linguistics, so as not to measure their significance against male achievements
, where it presents opinions as fact and provide instructions, as if this is an academic essay.
WP:Short description helps readers navigate pages by showing a short description of it in the search bar. In this case, the title is descriptive enough that I simply put none, but the template itself is still required. The page is no longer an orphan so you were correct to remove that tag. "Introduction" section header are not a typical part of a Wikipedia article. See MOS:LEADELEMENTS Ca talk to me! 22:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Response
[edit]@Ca Thank you for your message. I created this page for a university assignment, which requires me to submit a version that has not been edited by other users. I agree with and appreciate your comments and edits and will incorporate them back into the page as soon as possible.
- @Fleur Dierickx, you can submit a WP:PERMALINK of the page, so that it links to a specific revision only. Please do not revert further as it could be construed as WP:edit warring. 👍
- Start-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/21 June 2024
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Start-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- Start-Class Linguistics articles
- Low-importance Linguistics articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles