Talk:Hitachi Rail Italy Driverless Metro/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 18:44, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found
Linkrot: three found, two fixed. I could not find a replacement for the third.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 18:53, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
and automatic train supervisory. Should this be "automatic train supervision."? Or should it be Automatic train stop (ATS)?Line 5 is an under construction line of the Milan Metro, Italy, Please rephrase this is very clumsy.Again, Line C of the Rome Metro, Italy, is an under-construction 25.5 kilometers (15.8 mi) line "an under-construction 25.5 kilometers (15.8 mi) line" is not an English construct, perhaps "is a line under construction."The infobox header has MX3000. this is unexplained, shouldn't it be something like AnsaldoBreda Driverless Metro?- Seems likes someone changed the infobox after the nomination. Otherwise I've fixed up accordingly (supervision is correct). Arsenikk (talk) 22:13, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
ref #12[2] is dead and not available at the Internet Archive.ref #15 - can we have an English translation of the article title, also publication details.- Other references check out as far as my limited knowledge of Danish and Italian goes.
- I used Google Translate to read the Italian. Ref #15 contains the title (now also translated) the publisher/author and the year of publication, which makes up the complete publication information. Arsenikk (talk) 22:13, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
The three and four-car trains have six three-phase asynchronous motors, each giving a power output of 105 and 128 kilowatts (141 and 172 hp), giving each train a power output of 630 or 764 kilowatts (840 or 1,025 hp). The previous paragraph mentioned six car trains, are they in any way different?- Only Rome has six-car trains, and I have not been able to identify any figures for this, including no detailed information at this level on the project page. Arsenikk (talk) 22:13, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- OK
- Only Rome has six-car trains, and I have not been able to identify any figures for this, including no detailed information at this level on the project page. Arsenikk (talk) 22:13, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
Some concerns have been raised on the talk page - have these been dealt with?- I've replied, or the issue has been resolved somehow. Part of the comments are valid, parts are OR. Arsenikk (talk) 22:13, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- OK, on hold for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:26, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for addressing these concerns. I am happy to pass this as a good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:33, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
-
- Thank you for taking the time to review the article. It should all be fixed now. Arsenikk (talk) 22:13, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- OK, on hold for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:26, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: