Talk:Hoko River Archeological Site
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Paleontology
[edit]I note that this article includes a section on paleontology, with notes about Cheiragonidae family members. If these are the taxa discusses in the Schweitzer\Salva article then there should be some notation that the fossils are MUCH older then the archeological site being from the Eocene Hoko river formation. The paper lists the type locality for Montezumella eichhorni, the Cheiragonid referred to in the paper as being near west Kydikabbit, does this even fall in the Archeological Site? --Kevmin (talk) 03:06, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- B-Class Archaeology articles
- Low-importance Archaeology articles
- C-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
- Low-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
- C-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of Low-importance
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Washington articles
- Low-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- WikiProject United States articles