Talk:Hollywood Undercover/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   WEll written and sufficiently follows the MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All online references are live, assume good faith for off-line sources, all sources sufficiently reliable, the artcile is well referenced.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Sufficiently broad and focussed

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Neutral

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   A non free use rationale has been supplied. There was no caption for the book cover, so I added one

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   WEll, I just read it through another time and I really can't fault it apart from the lack of caption, which I decided to address directly. Congratulations on another good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:00, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Cirt (talk) 00:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC)