Talk:HomeCo Daily Needs REIT

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 December 2022. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 20 December 2022 by reviewer MaxnaCarta (talk · contribs).

Shopping Centers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal HomeCo Daily Needs REIT is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to the talk page for HomeCo Daily Needs REIT! Today I created the page with some information on the company. Make sure to add any more information in the future that you find, and hopefully some photos of some of their centres! HoHo3143 (talk) 14:56, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by draft creator, moved from the draft itself[edit]

Please read! I have added extra sources that include secondary independent news articles including the AFR, 7 news, shopping centre news, the urban developer and more. Also included has been sources from the company's stock exchange reports (required legally) and other information sourced from the company, its owner.

If you choose to decline the article, please tell me where to improve and how — Preceding unsigned comment added by HoHo3143 (talk • contribs) 06:11, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HoHo3143: I moved your comment here for a couple of reasons: "AfC comment" means that it is a comment from an AfC reviewer, and the reviewer script adds the comment template; sometimes that script screws up future comments if a comment has been added manually (don't ask me why, I just know I've seen it happen). It's also better in general to have discussions here on the talk page, so the draft itself doesn't get cluttered with discussion threads. --bonadea contributions talk 10:36, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback as requested[edit]

@HoHo3143: I see that the draft has been resubmitted for publication. There have been no substantive in sourcing since two different reviewers declined submission and following my response at the Teahouse. In response to your draft comment: Routine business buzz (funding, stock, mergers, openings, launches, etc.) does not contribute to notability. The 7NEWS coverage is a stock listing (routine) complemented by what HomeCo principals say (not independent). The Urban Developer coverage is routine. The additional Shopping Centre News citations are routine, leaving only one notability-contributing cite. Per WP:NCORP, notability needs non-routine and non-trivial coverage from multiple independent reliable sources. The multiple sources must be intellectually independent of one another as well as independent of the company. Again the new player article is good. Notability needs an article of comparable depth and audience, from a reliable source other then Shopping Centre News. If you keep resubmitting without improving the sources, the draft will likely be rejected with resubmission blocked. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My three main sources[edit]

Following this formula, here is my table that I believe is correct with new sources that I added HoHo3143 (talk) 10:19, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HoHo3143: Financing, mergers, acquisitions and other announcements generally fall under routine (non-substantial) coverage. The facts being cited are routine. The speculative nature of The Australian article raises an additional caution flag. The 2 new citations are paywalled, and I cannot fully evaluate them. I will leave the review to another editor. • Gene93k (talk) 10:40, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of 'advertisement'[edit]

Another editor has gone through and removed content that makes the article seem like an advertisement. HoHo3143 (talk) 05:16, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]