Talk:Hoover Commission

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hoover Commission article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

National Archives Stub‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of National Archives project, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.National ArchivesWikipedia:WikiProject National ArchivesTemplate:WikiProject National ArchivesNational Archives articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Untitled[edit]

The Hoover Commission Report on Organization of the Executive Branch of the Governement published by McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. has a list of members of the Commission on the page before the Title Page. The list does not include James Farley, who is listed as a member in the Wiki listing of members. ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.242.148.137 (talk) 21:30, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This dumb article does not say anything about what the Hoover Commission actually did.[edit]

It mentions the Reorganization Act of 1949 as some output of the Commission, but it's a red link so there's no description there, and this article says nothing else about the Act. Something is clearly missing. 70.109.180.207 (talk) 19:45, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hoover Commission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060918083842/http://www.ecommcode2.com/hoover/research/hooverpapers/hoover/postpres/hpphcom1.htm to http://www.ecommcode2.com/hoover/research/hooverpapers/hoover/postpres/hpphcom1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:00, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]