Talk:Hope Valley line
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Hope Valley Line. |
How many tonnes in a ton? 1.016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:4712:5101:FD57:682:BA69:B3CB (talk) 12:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Does anyone what stock the line uses, or whether or not it's electrified? 86.0.203.120 19:38, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Certainly not electrified - that was the quibble with shutting the Woodhead Line just to the north. Linuxlad 21:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Title
[edit]The large majority of news references to this line, seem to have it in the uppercase 'Line' "Hope+Valley+Line"&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjZhNeF65LqAhVFtnEKHU81BVg4FBD8BSgDegQIDBAF&biw=1366&bih=627 I would argue that this article has been downcased wrongly (and without any discussion). G-13114 (talk) 11:50, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Hope Valley upgrade
[edit]As there are quite a few articles about railway upgrades including Transpennine Route Upgrade, I was thinking of writing a separate article on the Hope Valley line upgrade. Do people think this is a good idea? GRALISTAIR (talk) 14:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- For a passing loop and a new platform? I'm not sure this is of the scale or promotion with distinct identity as the TRU. I suspect there will be a fair few local and industry sources saying what's going on and what it costs etc but is that really passing GNG? Rcsprinter123 (articulate) 00:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well I had started one but I have now put in an archived sandbox. I will resurrect it easily if/when there are more upgrades to the line and it warrants its own article. GRALISTAIR (talk) 20:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)