The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Does the Jo Cox thing really count as criticism? It's basically just someone observing that they put out an incorrect press release. To define that as criticism seems rather partisan.
Conversely I see someone has put a tag questioning the importance of the fact the movement leader has been accused of islamophobia. Even if that is technically criticising the leader not the organisation at large, at least not directly, it seems a far better candidate for inclusion. Certainly if you were to keep one thing or the other I'd keep the latter. Firestar47 (talk) 22:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What about the idea the George Soros funds Hope not hate? And covert recordings of people who were 'informed' by hope not hate like BBC Panorama who were dropped by Panorama after their collusion was exposed? There isn't any criticism of hope not hate in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isaw (talk • contribs) 11:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Put up totally true and valid evidence that Nick Lowles posted misinformation multiple times but someone who doesn’t care about both sides of the story has deleted the evidence to try cover up, why feel the need to remove the solid evidence of someone doing illegal things (posting misinformation) he had done on the internet? Hoaxing the 100 planned protests cost government and business’ a lot of money just for the lie he was spreading? Don’t let the people who read this article thing he made just one little mistake when he made plenty of mistakes and don’t even know if they were accidental considering the amount 78.148.152.129 (talk) 15:35, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}