Talk:Horace Darwin
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Horace Darwin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051215150732/http://darwin.lib.cam.ac.uk/perl/nav?class=name;term=Darwin%2C%20Horace;dmode=dr to http://darwin.lib.cam.ac.uk/perl/nav?class=name;term=Darwin%2C%20Horace;dmode=dr
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
General engineer, rather than "civil engineer"
[edit]I was surprised to see that the article began by describing Horace Darwin as a "civil engineer". I believe that 100 years ago this just meant "non-military engineer", which would be a fair description. Today "civil engineer" indicates more specialism, and I think we would, given his founding of and contributions to the Cambridge Scientific Instrument Co., describe him as a mechanical electrical and general engineer. So I propose updating the article to define him simply as an engineer. Any comments? Ambrose H. Field (talk) 14:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
I have now made appropriate changes. Ambrose H. Field (talk) 14:37, 7 March 2021 (UTC)