This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Barack Obama (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Barack Obama, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Barack ObamaWikipedia:WikiProject Barack ObamaTemplate:WikiProject Barack ObamaBarack Obama articles

Position on Tobacco

Untitled

Who keeps removing the Position on Tobacco section and why? Given the focus of Mr. Koh's career, this section should be kept and expanded. Bhirsch (talk) 03:59, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The citation by the poster was a letter to the editor that is unsubstantiated. 9:06 PM, 5 January 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.58.207.16 (talk) 02:06, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Koh, Such letters are always fact checked/verified before publication, generally to a higher degree than reporters' submissions. It is a valid reference. No dice again. Bhirsch (talk) 20:45, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have a stake here between Dr. Koh or you, but Bhirsch what you said is untrue. Just look at the New York Times' snafu with the recent letter to the editor from the "Mayor of Paris." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ba45 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Koh, a room full of people heard you say it and no one refuted the LTE. Wp is not here to protect your relatively minuscule public image.Bhirsch (talk) 23:06, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add this claim again without a proper citation that can be checked. The one you cite cannot be checked online. Also please stop adding protection templates for pages that are not protected, that is vandalism. Martin451 (talk) 00:08, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]