Talk:Hubert William Lewis

Hubert William Lewis has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 6, 2019. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hubert William Lewis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Biography / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Wales Mid‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or added to during the Victoria Cross Reference Migration. It may contain material that was used with permission from victoriacross.net.

A fact from Hubert William Lewis appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 August 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Hubert William Lewis was awarded the Victoria Cross after capturing three enemy soldiers and carrying an officer to safety despite being wounded twice?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2019/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hubert William Lewis.

Wikipedia

Moving from article[edit]

I have moved the sections "The medal" and "Reference" from the main article, as first-person content does not go in articles. See below. Telsa 09:55, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The medal[edit]

please update if you know where his medal is publicly displayed (see below) It is possibly on display in a Hotel in Cardiff, if anyone knows which one that would be great!

Reference[edit]

My Uncle, Hubert 'Stokey' Lewis's VC was purchased privately at an auction in 1994. During that period I was in talks with the Regimental Museum at Cardiff Castle in an attempt to pursuade them to put in a bid. This failed and I was told that it had been sold to a Hotelier in Cardiff, but alas I do not know which hotel it was. I was also led to believe that it was on display there.

contact: gavinmarchant@hotmail.com

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hubert William Lewis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100514213448/http://www.homeusers.prestel.co.uk/stewart/wales.htm to http://www.homeusers.prestel.co.uk/stewart/wales.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:49, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hubert William Lewis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 08:21, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will take this one. Comments to follow in due course. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 08:21, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much Zawed. I've branched out a bit here from my usual editing area, so apologies if there's any obvious issues. Kosack (talk) 08:41, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is in pretty good shape. I've made a few tweaks, but there are still some areas that need a bit of work.

"Lewis lightly nicked him": who is "him ' here? The reporter or Bradbury? -Reworded
Rather than "Military Career" as a heading, which is suggestive of a professional soldier, I suggest "First World War". - Done
"organised by Major Birt,...": This suggests some antecedence when in fact there isn't. Suggest "organised by a Major Birt,..." - Done
"Lewis, who was 20 years old": but the first sentence says he was 18? - Reworded
In a few places, ranks are capitalised when they aren't being used as title. Eg it should be "Captain Name", "Name was promoted to captain" - Done
The way the London Gazette is dealt with isn't quite right. See Frederick Fisher (soldier) for an exemplar. Also, the quoting from the gazette isn't accurate instead it looks to be a near copy of the text from the vconline ref. - Done

Hope you don't mind, but I have slightly rejigged this section to make a better connection between the action and the award. I also moved the image; because of the orientation of the subject (the car looks to be moving from right to left) it works better facing the text. Zawed (talk) 22:56, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem. Kosack (talk) 05:48, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"300 yards": do a conversion to metres. - Done
In the main body of the article, after first instance of Victoria Cross, add a (VC) and then just use VC thereafter. - Done
The later life section reads uncomfortably close to the text of the vconline ref - Trimmed and reworded
Image check: Infobox has a fair use tag but for Guggs, if the author is unknown, can we be confident about the author's life plus 70 years tag?

In all honesty I'm not sure, I'm not great with image licensing and this wasn't my upload. Happy to remove if you're not happy with it. Kosack (talk) 14:49, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not great with image licencing either so that makes two of us. I think the copyright tags just need amending. Since we need to have a US tag, I think deleting the life plus 70 years portion of the existing tag and then adding one for the UK where the author is anonymous may be OK. Maybe use PD-UK-unknown? The photo may have been published in a newspaper at the time so you may want to have a quick scan of UK newspaper archive websites as well. Zawed (talk) 22:56, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No dupe links (no action needed)
one dab link - Seaford - Done
The external links worked OK for me although have to AGF on the Sinclair ref since it requires a subscription.

That's about it for me at this stage. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:28, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Zawed: Thanks very much for the review, I've addressed all of the issues listed above and replied regarding the image. Let me know what you think. Kosack (talk) 14:49, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, a couple of comments above for consideration, but this is almost ready to go GA. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 22:56, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Zawed:, I've made the adjustments to the image licensing. Can't seem to find any use in a newspaper via Google images, the Times Digital Archive or Newspapers.com. Kosack (talk) 06:03, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This looks good. I am happy that this artcile satisfies the GA criteria: it is wellwritten in neutral text and is appropriately referenced, appears to broadly cover the subject, stable and includes images with suitable tags. Passing as GA now. Zawed (talk) 08:23, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]