Talk:Hugh Luttrell (MP, died 1428)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group.

Military history: British / European / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

References[edit]

I saw this needed references so I found one and added it, I believe there are more so I tagged it for ref improve. Jihadcola (talk) 20:22, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. However, there is consensus that the article currently at "Hugh Luttrell" should be moved to Hugh Luttrell (Liberal politician) and "Hugh Luttrell" should be turned into a dab page. Jenks24 (talk) 06:57, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Hugh Luttrell → Hugh Luttrell – I am not very sure if honorific 'Sir" is needed here ref: MOS:HONORIFIC! Trying to find the answer through this requested move.Tito Dutta ✉ 15:30, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ideally we wouldn't have "Sir" in the article name, per naming conventions, but you can't move this article to Hugh Luttrell because there's already another article there. Perhaps there is another disambiguator such as Hugh Luttrell (nobleman)? Interplanet Janet, Esquire IANAL 22:54, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support as primary topic and rename the other article Hugh Luttrell (Liberal politician). -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:56, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't agree that either is the primary topic, as neither has a lot of hits, and Sir Hugh has precisely no internal links. A dab page at Hugh Luttrell looks like the best solution. Interplanet Janet, Esquire IANAL 20:25, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as primary topic. Per Interplanet Janet's explanation, Hugh Luttrell should be a dab page, with its existing content moved to Hugh Luttrell (Liberal politician) or other agreed title. -- Trevj (talk) 11:28, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
oppose -- We do not like "Sir" as part of article titles (except baronets), but it is sometimes useful to dismabiguate, as here. the target is already an article and correctly has a "for" hotnote to link to the subject. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.