Talk:Human-based genetic algorithm

Robotics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Systems Low‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Cybernetics.

HCI Category

The Interactive evolutionary computation article has its own category, and is also categorized under User interface techniques. The Interactive evolutionary computation category is a subcat under the User interface category, which is one level under the HCI supercat. The HCI top level category had sprawled out to nearly 200 articles at one point, which is why it has been split out and refined. Writers on this topic, please review the HCI cat hierarchy for reference. Thanks. -- Dx 17:58, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your repeated category changes here are inappropriate. This comment is also inconsistent with your own behavior as you are the person who removed IEC category from HCI category on January 16 [1]. I reverted your change there because you agree that IEC is part of HCI here. 'User interface' is obviously inappropriate and can't be a compromise. While it is true that IEC has user interface, as any other HCI method, you can't say that IEC is a user interface, so you can't place it into that category. IEC is a way to organize human-computer interaction in an evolutionary way. I understand that you want to improve the classification, but please try to not make it worse. 130.126.81.217 20:20, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Innovation?

It's not clear to me why this article is in Category:Innovation. Is it because this is a method of innovation? Or is it because this HBGA is an innovation? ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 18:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm removing this from Category:Innovation for now. Feel free to restore it if I am wrong. ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 23:28, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Robotics

Why is this part of the robotics project? I don't see anything in the article that has anything to do with robotics. --Benjamin James Bush (talk) 04:44, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Human-based genetic algorithm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110709014211/http://derrickcheng.com/Project/HBGA/ to http://www.derrickcheng.com/Project/HBGA

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:20, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]