Talk:Hurricane Bob (1985)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleHurricane Bob (1985) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 28, 2010.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 26, 2006Good article nomineeListed
March 19, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
August 22, 2009Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 2, 2006.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Hurricane Bob was the first of a record-tying six hurricanes to hit the United States in 1985?
Current status: Featured article

GA nom on Hold for 7 days[edit]

Hi,

Looking pretty good here. I put a couple {{fact}} tags on it. Just try to look for stuff that people might put in a book report, or that might people say "Really?" and cite the reference. But this article is actually right on the bare edge of passing, just as it is.

I looked as the supplied reference for the phrase "Bob failed to organize significantly..." and didn't see anything about failure to organize. I didn't look at any other refs; did you get them right?

Good work! --Ling.Nut 02:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added one source for the intro, but the rest are there. The source is at the end of the section, not at the end of every sentence. The WPTC does it this way. Having a reference for every last sentence would be overkill, so we just put a reference at the end of every time we use the source. The phrase "Bob failed to organize significantly" isn't in that source; rather it is indirectly stated. The source from which it comes from indicate it didn't strengthen, and most of the convection was to the south of the center. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Who am I to argue with WPTC? PASS.--Ling.Nut 02:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Cool :) Hurricanehink (talk) 02:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A-class[edit]

Why is it that this is the only A-class article I have seen? Most articles are either GA or FA. Juliancolton (talk) 12:40, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are 7 A-class articles, which are similar to FA class in quality, but they haven't gone through an FAC run. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:52, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So then why don't we send this A-class to FAC? Juliancolton (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just because an article is at A-class doesn't mean we should send them all to FAC. There are more than 50 articles on FAC, including one hurricane article, and two hurricane articles are on Peer Review. We should focus on them first so we don't overload the FAC system, since the WPTC typically usually gets few comments on hurricane FAC's. That said, as the author, I'll think about taking this one to FAC. Hurricanehink (talk) 18:39, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any real difference between A and FA articles? Juliancolton (talk) 21:14, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. A-class articles can be articles that are relatively short but are still of great quality. Additionally, they might not be quite complete, possibly very long and needs some trimming before going for an FA run, or could be a very well-written article on a non-notable article, for which the FA process would be merely to get the FA star. Since A-class articles should have already passed a GA, they are already included in statistics on good articles (most stats on quality articles on WP refer to articles GA or better), so just going through the FA process to get the star is not desirable in some instances. Not every article needs to become an FA, after all. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I thought the WPTC project page says the goal is to get all tropical cyclone articles featured. Juliancolton (talk) 22:14, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That was an impossible goal set a few years ago, and it has been changed. Hurricanehink (talk) 23:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps Review: Pass[edit]

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 07:43, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FAC review continued[edit]

  • "In Beaufort County, where the storm came ashore, officials closed city and county offices early and advised businesses to send their workers home early." This is very similar to what is in the source. The source text is "In Beaufort County, S.C., where the storm center was expected to come ashore, city and county offices were closed early and businesses were advised to send their employees home early as well."
  • "Tropical Storm Bob flooded roads and downed trees in the area." What is "area" referring to here?
  • "The roads were re-opened when the waters subsided," Copied pretty much verbatim from the source.
  • "though the causeway to Sanibel Island sustained more significant damage" The source doesn't support this claim; it only says that the road sustained damage. Dabomb87 (talk) 20:05, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Should be fixed. I tried to tinker with the first sentence a bit, but I'm afraid it sounds awkward now. Could you take a look? –Juliancolton | Talk 20:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bob?[edit]

Unusual name for a hurricane? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.139.226.146 (talk) 23:21, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dablink added[edit]

This was one of three big storms named "Bob", hence the need for clarification. As the 1991 Cape Cod t-shirts said, "I was blown by Bob". Wordreader (talk) 17:34, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hurricane Bob (1985)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Needs copyedit of Impact section and pictures if available. Titoxd(?!?) 21:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 21:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 18:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hurricane Bob (1985). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Bob (1985). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:07, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Bob (1985). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hurricane_Bob_(1985)&oldid=1210995480"