Talk:Hurricane Cosme (1989)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CrowzRSA 14:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Meteorological history

• However, it was characterized by favorable outflow and banding. - reads poorly, consider rewording.
• Operationally, the storm was not named until several hours later - Ref one doesn't back this up.
• June 21;[2] this.. perhaps exchange semi-colon for period.
• it reached maximum sustained winds of 85 mph (140 km/h) both "mph" and "km/h" should be linked.
• Add link to "barometric pressure" as well.
• During the night of June 21 perhaps exchange "the night" for a time-span (e.g. "From hours eight to twelve...")

Preparations and impact

• Mexican officials evacuated nearly 260 people Personally I think it should be spelt out, but per WP:ORDINAL it is not required.
• flash flood watches and warnings were issued. [7] there should not be a space between the ref and period.

I have addressed these issues. Leave Message, Yellow Evan home

Forgotten comments....

• weakening into a tropical storm shortly after coming ashore..[2] - two periods
• High winds produced by the storm knocked down numerous trees and power lines throughout the affected areas. - instead of "knocked down", maybe use "damaged" or "struck"
• The highest rainfall recorded in relation to Cosme was 16.1 in (410 mm) in Yautepec San Bartolo, Mexico - change "Yautepec San Bartolo" to "San Bartolo Yautepec" add link to it.
• Many adobe homes were destroyed, but a specific cost of damage is unknown. - change "a" to "the"
• flash flood watches and warnings were issued. [7] - still should not be a space between the ref and period.

I have addressed these issues. Leave Message, Yellow Evan home

Result

---

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: - Pass.

• Wow, this is a short, but impressive article. Only a few minor errors that were fixed quickly. Great job finding sources. I have passed the article. Great job!! CrowzRSA ^{22:49, 9 May 2010 (UTC)}