Talk:Hurricane Fausto (2008)

Hurricane Fausto (2008) was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 25, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed
November 20, 2020	Good article reassessment	Delisted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 9, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Hurricane Fausto of the 2008 Pacific hurricane season reportedly produced hurricane-force winds on Socorro Island despite being 115 mi (185 km) away from the island?

Current status: Delisted good article

This article was nominated for merging with 2008 Pacific hurricane season on 22:50, 11 November 2020 (UTC). The result of the discussion (permanent link) was merged.

Merge?[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was merged. It's already over a week and this should have been merged by this point before the moratorium discussion had started. Per WP:MERGE, any user may close the discussion and move forward with the merger if enough time (normally one week or more) has elapsed and there has been no discussion or if there is unanimous consent to merge. Since I want to expand 2008 PHS by this point and eventually get the season article to GA, I will go for it now. While the discussion is not unanimous, I'm going WP:IAR. SMB9 9thx my edits 07:12, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This hurricane did bring some hurricane-strength winds on Clarion and Socorro islands, but ultimately this is an average non-landfalling East Pacific hurricane. 2008 PHS is also not a GA, so merging this article could help. SMB9 9thx my edits 22:50, 11 November 2020 (UTC)\[reply]

Support Two nothingburgers of storms, did nothing notable enough for an article. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 23:30, 12 November 2020 (UTC) (transcluded from original at Talk:2008 Pacific hurricane season) SMB9 9thx my edits 02:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support If only it had made landfall, this merge discussion wouldn't be here. 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 13:21, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Minor impacts and nothing significant about the storm Cyclonetracker (talk) 20:36, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is a consensus for merging. SMB9 9thx my edits 02:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I care a lot less about keeping this than most merge proposals just because of how generic the storm was and at least the season article isn't well developed. I'll merge this and delist if there's no discussion on this further by the end of the week. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 05:29, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment See WT:WPTC#Merge discussions getting out of hand: moratorium proposal. I think we should step away from merges for 3-5 months, and focus on creating. 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 12:54, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose it's a GA, but mostly it's cause of this. --HurricaneTracker495 School Chromebook (talk) 18:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Linking to a discussion on merges has no merit here as you aren't being specific enough on how its relevant. You have to counter the arguments given by those in favor of merging here. The facts are this storm had no meaningful impact, broke no records, and the article relies too much on primary sourcing. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 19:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impacts can go in the article.ChessEric (talk · contribs) 01:55, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.