Talk:Hurricane Florence (1994)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I will be assessing Hurricane Florence --Elena85 ^{1959 Pacific Hurricane Season} 22:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

Is good and contains a brief storm history.

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

Checks out okay!

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

Works out well

2. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

Good

2. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Yes

2. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I've Passed the article, it is great! --Elena85 ^{1959 Pacific Hurricane Season} 23:00, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

• P.S.- I am a fast reader if you are wondering why I did this so quick.

Wow, very fast, 5 min. :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 23:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)