Talk:Hurricane Humberto (1995)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hurricane Humberto (1995) redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Hurricane Humberto (1995) was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 20, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
May 22, 2008	Good article reassessment	Kept

Current status: Delisted good article

Todo[edit]

Looks pretty good for storm that didn't affect land. The storm history should be shortened a bit - it's too long as it is. The unisys reference should be changed to something more official. Hurricanehink (talk) 05:04, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The NOAA's 1995 page doesn't work either as a ref. You should use Hurdat for any records that were never explicitely stated. Hurricanehink (talk) 05:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA review[edit]

Well-written - Pass - One problem, though. The storm history is a bit too long. Try cutting it down a bit. Six paragraphs isn't needed for a storm that lasted only a few days.
Factually accurate - Pass , though see if there are any non-NOAA sources (unlikely but possible)
Broad - Pass (gotta love the fish storm articles, nice and easy)
Non-POV/Stable - Pass
Images - Pass

Good job Crazy, GA passed. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:38, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps Review: Pass[edit]

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 21:08, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge[edit]

Humberto in 1995 wasn't that meteorologically extraordinary of a storm, it doesn't have any impact on land. --219.79.127.179 (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyclonebiskit, Hurricanehink, and CrazyC83: you may discuss about it. --219.79.127.179 (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose for now, until the 1995 AHS article is complete. 1995 was a busy season, and storms from busy seasons need to be handled differently. I think this article is appropriate, and it was part of a parade of storms. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 15:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really want to add more content to 1995 AHS at this time, given moving content to the season article would increase its content size to 116kb. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 15:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?[edit]

MERGED

WP:BOLDly merging. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 15:27, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article is not needed. The only thing notable is that it formed in rapid succession with other storms, that could easily be mentioned elsewhere. Therefore I propose a merge. --HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 20:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge No impacts. SMB9 9thx my edits 08:22, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Its only record can easily be mentioned in the season article. 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 12:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.