Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Martha

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHurricane Martha has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 4, 2013Good article nomineeListed

Opening sentence[edit]

You need a better source for the opening. You can't use HURDAT to say it was the only landfall. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:46, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Martha/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TheAustinMan (talk · contribs) 17:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again George! I will be reviewing Martha. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 17:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

  • "... reported in the impacts countries." → impacts → impacted
  • "Agricultural land was flooded in Almirante, Bocas del Toro and inundated streets and low-lying areas in Puerto Armuelles, Chiriquí." You don't provide the substance (rain!) that inundated streets in low-lying areas. From what I read, agricultural land inundated streets. You could instead say, "Agricultural land was flooded in Almirante, Bocas del Toro and streets became inundated in low-lying areas of Puerto Armuelles, Chiriquí."
  • "...5 deaths were reported." → "...five deaths were reported."

Meteorological history[edit]

  • "According to the Best Track..." Instead of calling it just 'best track,' maybe you could say HURDAT?
  • "...tropical cyclone attained a maximum sustained winds..." No need to have the article 'a.'
  • "...pressure of 980 mbar (29 inHg)[5] though it was later..." You need a comma before the reference.
  • "Operationally, winds were thought to be only 50 mph (85 km/h)..." So, did it change? If it still is 50 mph, there's no need to say operationally.

Preparations and impact[edit]

  • "...pertained to tides in the Gulf of Mosquitoes." → Change GOM to Mosquito Gulf and link to Golfo de los Mosquitos.
  • "...of agriculture land..." → "...of agricultural land..."
  • "...capital city of San Jose." You need an é.

That's all I have for this review. Once the issues are fixed, I'll pass. Nice work! TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 17:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hurricane Martha/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Look for more impact information, ideally outside of NOAA. Looks good otherwise. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 23:41, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:46, 12 October 2010 (UTC). Substituted at 18:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)