Talk:Hurricane Neki

Hurricane Neki has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 7, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Weather: Tropical / Eastern Pacific Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

WMO NOAA TC report

Preps/impact from NOAA's report to the Typhoon Committee. Page 6. Hurricane Neki formed just over 700 miles due south of the Hawaiian Islands on 18 October. Hurricane Neki reached a peak intensity of 105 KT on 22 October. The track of Neki necessitated a Hurricane Watch for Johnston Island and Hurricane Watches and Warnings for portions of the Papahanaumokuakea National Monument (Northwestern Hawaiian Islands). While Johnston Island was uninhabited, remote U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service camps on Laysan Island, Tern Island, and French Frigate Shoals had to be evacuated. The NOAA ship Oscar Sette safely evacuated 7 people from Laysan Island and a Coast Guard C-130 safely evacuated 10 people from Tern Island and French Frigate Shoals. There were no impacts to the main Hawaiian Islands.Jason Rees (talk) 20:03, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Neki/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Marcusmax(speak) 14:48, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My initial impressions of this article are very positive, it looks detailed and well-written but I will look everything over before coming to a conclusion.

Bravo! This is a very well written article, the Meteorological History section is detailed and offers a thorough analysis of Neki and the disturbance leading up to the cyclone. The preparations and impact section is less detailed, but given the remote location of this storm, it is definitely decent. The only problem here is Link rot, the following references need to be replaced with new or alternative versions of information before I can pass this:

--Marcusmax(speak) 15:17, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, everything should be in order. Thanks a lot for the review! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:26, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well that was quick, I'll pass. -Marcusmax(speak) 15:29, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Neki. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20091027/BREAKING01/91027019/Overflight+indicates+Neki+did+minimal+damage+in+Papahanaumokuakea+

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:01, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]