Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Willa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleHurricane Willa is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starHurricane Willa is part of the 2018 Pacific hurricane season series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 20, 2023.
In the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 23, 2020Good article nomineeListed
May 23, 2020Featured topic removal candidateKept
August 15, 2020Featured article candidatePromoted
June 10, 2021Featured topic candidatePromoted
August 17, 2024Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on October 29, 2018.
Current status: Featured article


Todo

[edit]

Some links:

Windspeed at landfall

[edit]

Willa hit Sinaloa as a 120 mph storm, but shortly before striking the mainland of Mexico, Willa passed over Las Islas Marias from the Revillagigedo Islands as a 125 mph storm, so shouldn't Willa technically be at a tie with Tico, Olivia, Odile, and Lane in windspeed in the table? Rye998 (talk) 23:57, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

VERY VERY late response but no, Since it didn’t make landfall in mainland Mexico. TheEasternEditer (talk) 23:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Prep

[edit]

@Hurricanehink: I just wanted to notify you that I will be using this for the GAN prep (mainly just the massive expansion of the preps, impact, and aftermath). I know you will be working on Floyd, but I am going to get sources gathered. NoahTalk 16:56, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Noah! I saw that NCDC has a bit more for Texas. The harder part is gonna be getting good sources from Mexico, due to the language barrier, but that shouldn't be too tough. I also found some more sources from ReliefWeb. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:08, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Hurricanehink: Did you see how much I churned up in a single search (focused on Sinaloa)? I will conduct more searches for other states and preps once I get home from work tonight. I did remove duplicate links earlier. NoahTalk 18:10, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also, @Oof-off: is helping to locate some sources for the US in case there is more than just Texas. NoahTalk 18:13, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yea, that's a good find so far. And as for US, there'll probably be a bit for Louisiana too. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Did you go through my todo links from above? YE Pacific Hurricane 22:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I had some specific search terms I intended to use for finding Spanish sources. @Hurricanehink: For the most part, I have found info on the color-coded weather alerts, but it may need some additional work. I'm thinking we could churn out quite a large article on this storm... It appears the gov't has neglected the victims as well. Could you please add any relevant storm event reports under a new section header when you get a chance? NoahTalk 01:57, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
When I get around to Willa, I'll just start adding the info, as opposed to adding links. I think it's easier that way, given how big of the article is gonna be, to just start compiling it. The article will be in a predictable structure: preps (evacuations, closures, warnings), impact (general Mexico section, sub-sections for Sinaloa and Nayarit, US), and aftermath (aid, rebuilding). ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:33, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will add information in as I get time. I will worry more about organization later. NoahTalk 19:13, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good plan. I sometimes end up working on several articles at a time. You put in the work one edit at a time, and eventually, as you know, your edits could result in a featured article. Speaking of, I better go write on the talk page of another 2018 storm, so you don't have to ask for a review again :P ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:21, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Hurricanehink: Hey, was just wondering about the information you found for the US. I am going to start adding in information again (to the GAN prep page) as my classes settle down in the next couple of weeks. NoahTalk 04:17, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I added a bit from NCDC. There's nothing from Louisiana, and the Texas bit is pretty limited. Nothing mentioned Willa specifically, but given that the TCR talked about heavy rainfall on 10/24, and the NCDC had events on 10/24 in Galveston, I felt it was fine to add those flooding details. I also added a bit that I found, linking Willa's remnants to a developing nor'easter. I know it's not much, but I don't have a lot of time to edit these days. :/ Damn RL ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:53, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Hurricanehink: I will attempt to add more to the GAN prep page some weekend in the future. Once I burn through everything, I will have to have someoneelse integrate the content and merge the history. NoahTalk 12:16, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Willa/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: JavaHurricane (talk · contribs) 11:44, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Will do. -- JavaHurricane 11:44, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  1. I have disambiguated a few links. I don't think any others exist, but please check if any remain.
  2. "Though the system subsequently crossed over Central America into the East Pacific, without significant organization." - Should be "However, ...".
Changed. NoahTalk 14:02, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  1. "Later in the day, the system became a tropical storm as it began to rapidly intensify. Willa became a Category 4 major hurricane on October 21, before strengthening further to Category 5 intensity on the next day." We could do with better sentence construction.
Better? NoahTalk 14:02, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  1. MH is top class, no problems there.
  2. "Mexican Secretariat of the Navy" - is the person's name available?
Added the guy's name.. would have been the one under the old president. NoahTalk 14:02, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  1. "In Mazatlán, rockslides and flooding of the Camarón lagoon occurred." Bad sentence construction, could be improved.
Better? NoahTalk 14:03, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  1. "Acaponeta was similarly severely impacted as record-breaking flooding occurred along the Acaponeta River, [...]" - any sources about "record-reaking"?
"They calculate a flow of 17 thousand cubic meters, an unprecedented figure in the Nayarite records." this is what the source says for that. NoahTalk 14:02, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  1. "There, approximately 1,820 people were provided with 1,400 food rations." Where is "there"?
Clarified that that was Sinaloa. NoahTalk 14:02, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, a good read! I have no hesitation in passing this, but till the above issues are fixed, I'll keep this  On hold. Cheers! -- JavaHurricane 13:24, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All problems are now fixed. Passed for GA. On a side note, I think we could start preparing for a possible FAC from now on. The MH is top-notch, and the preparations and aftermath are also very nicely written. A little bit of copyediting and we could get Willa to FA-class. -- JavaHurricane 14:11, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why wasn't Willa retired?

[edit]

I was reading the reasons why the currently retired Pacific Hurricanes were retired. Seeing that Willa did a few hundred thousand dollars away from 1 billion in damage, I ask out of curiosity, why didn't the name get retired along with the other Category 5 hurricanes of the season (in my opinion, they all had high probabilities for retirement because of their impact)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.214.58.75 (talk) 16:41, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@71.214.58.75: Honestly, that question can only be answered by the Mexican Government and the hurricane committee since they are the ones that would have requested/voted on it. It honestly should have been given the severity of the impact. NoahTalk 16:42, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

source issues

[edit]

A just found couple of sources looks ... not right:

  • Stewart, Stacy (October 21, 2018). Hurricane Willa Discussion Number 5 (Report). National Hurricane Center. Archived from the original on October 21, 2018. Retrieved February 27, 2019.</ref>
  • Cangialosi, John (October 22, 2018). Hurricane Willa Discussion Number 8 (Report). National Hurricane Center. Archived from the original on October 21, 2018. Retrieved February 27, 2019.</ref>
Same urls with different title & author, I guess seond one should be "...008.shtml?", also date should be 21st?

Also

Same urls, same title & date but different author, cite for different sentence, I guess the second one is wrong, but I have also check ...010/011/012/013/014/015/016.shtml, none of them have the right author.--Jarodalien (talk) 16:32, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • 10, 11 and 16 were right
  • 12, 13, and 15 were not even used
  • Fixed 14
  • Fixed the above issue with the link...
@Jarodalien:I am really unsure how all those errors made it through the FAC. NoahTalk 17:03, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User:Hurricane Noah: "...The cost to repair public infrasturcture in Nayarit was evaluated at approximately MX$2.2 billion (US$92,000)"
This can't be right, 92 million right?--Jarodalien (talk) 06:33, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. NoahTalk 10:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hurricane Noah, KN2731, Hurricanehink, and anyone watching: does anyone have an objection to running this at TFA for the 5th anniversary in October? - Dank (push to talk) 03:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]