Jump to content

Talk:Hurva Synagogue/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GAR soon.Pyrotec (talk) 20:55, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GAR

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    A very readable article
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    A good number of sources provided
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    A Good Article.

Congratulations on this article, I'm awarding GA status.Pyrotec (talk) 15:53, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]