Talk:Hurwitz quaternion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Abuse of notation?[edit]

Is this an abuse of notation?

Or is this a proper expression of adding a number to every member of a set? ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 19:04, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It can be seen as a coset of the integers in the rationals. Charles Matthews (talk) 16:48, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, so the relationship is: Z is a subset of Q, and Z+1/2={n+1/2: n an element of Z} is a coset of Z in Q? ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 17:57, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. Charles Matthews (talk) 21:44, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 15:36, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merger[edit]

There seems no reason for this to be a separate article to Hurwitz quaternion order. Deltahedron (talk) 16:08, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]