Talk:Hyundai Accent WRC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As per WP:SPLIT[edit]

Hi Pelmeen10 - The issue is not whether or not the article is a proper article. The issue is one of proper attribution as per WP:SPLIT. Normally I would simply have self-reverted, and provided that attribution, but the editor who split the article incorrectly has done this in the past. I felt it better to allow them the opportunity to revert and provide that attribution. You can feel free to also revert me, as long as you provide proper attribution as per WP policy. I think it's better that we let the editor who did the original split do it, so they will learn how to do it correctly. Onel5969 TT me 22:37, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, it's not WP:SIZESPLIT. It is WP:CONSPLIT. The page where I spilt from is a section, which needs additional refs for verification, which is why I add several refs to the article per WP:V. Moreover, the car has competed in the championship, so WP:N as well. In fact, all World Rally Cars should have their own article as long as we provide enough reliable sources. Unnamelessness (talk) 01:18, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also, there are six wikipedia in other languages treat the rally car with an article. I can't see why we can't. Unnamelessness (talk) 01:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm tempted to use terms like, "I'll use small words...", but I won't. This isn't a big thing, just simply look at the attribution requirements of WP:SPLIT and follow them. Not rocket science. Not even rudimentary 1+1=2 science. Onel5969 TT me 01:48, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An't I explaining clearly enough? I do follow the attribution requirements of WP:SPLIT. Per WP:CONSPLIT, which is a sub-policy of WP:SPLIT,
"When two or more distinct topics with the same or a similar titles are being written about on the same page, even if they are closely related, a content split may be considered, and a disambiguation page created to point readers to the separate pages."
The rally car is just use the model of the road car, but beneath it, that is a total different machine — They are two topics, but written in one page, so it should receive a content split. Unnamelessness (talk) 07:18, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The issue is not one of splitting the article, but of providing correct attribution. See WP:CORRECTSPLIT, particularly in this case #4. That's all you have to do, which is now the fifth time this is being explained to you.Onel5969 TT me 11:36, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Just to be clear, I have no issue with the split, but I do have an issue with you not following the proper WP policy. This isn't a content dispute, it's a policy error. You did the same thing on another article, Toyota Corolla WRC, I reverted you there, and then self-reverted with the proper attribution in an effort to give you an example of how it should be done properly. Not sure why you are simply refusing to provide attribution.Onel5969 TT me 11:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you said this earlier, there will be no misunderstanding. Unnamelessness (talk) 11:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
First, I want to apologize for my uncivil comment to you in my response to your initial response to me above. That was uncalled for. Second, I did say it to you, several times. First in this edit summary; Second, above in the second sentence on this talk page; and Third, in this edit summary. Regardless, now it's been handled, so all's good. Onel5969 TT me 12:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]