Talk:I'm OK – You're OK
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the I'm OK – You're OK article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
OR in the Criticisms section
[edit]Ripped out quite a lot of OR rubbish from the criticsms section. ElectricRay (talk) 13:27, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
themes
[edit]I'm proposing to add a section describing the major themes to this book, and removing (for now) the elements of the current article that seem to make unsubstantiated POV judgements - any objections or anyone else working on this at the moment? Infilms (talk) 09:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- OK I'm done adding new material. I invite other editors who know this subject to improve this article further. Hugh Mason (talk • contribs 20:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Shouldn't a person be referred to by his or her last name, as in Penfield for Wilder Penfield?
[edit]The subject line says it all. Just wondering why the author used the first name, Wilder, to refer to the neurosurgeon? (69.155.140.190 (talk) 05:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC))
POV issues
[edit]There's a clear "positive" bias in the language of this article, especially in the lead, and that's even allowing for the Criticism section. I've added CN for a couple of the more blatant examples (in the lead), but the whole thing could do with a clean up towards a more neutral tone. Thomask0 (talk) 03:09, 14 June 2015 (UTC)