Talk:I.C. Colony

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Maharashtra / Mumbai Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Mumbai (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

{Pov Statement}

This wiki article is written purely in a biased manner which is very readily apparent at first glance.
There are ZERO references provided for any of the claims made in this wiki article. Which is a surprise.
wrt "The locality is one of the most sought after residential places in the Western suburbs" - this statement is unsubstantiated.
This statement is made without any supporting reference material: "with property prices roughly double the average for the suburb of Borivali or even higher". The purpose of such a statement can only be for WP:SOAPBOX & WP:PROMO.
This statement: "The colony is known for its extremely peaceful locale, large open playgrounds and parks, food, annual festivities, easy accessibility to the Link road, SV road, Gorai-Manori-Uttan beaches, the Western Express Highway, Western Railway Line, and the upcoming Mumbai Metro Line 2A."" is true for almost every Locale/society/colony/slum/building starting from Bandra, all the way up to Dahisar. It's presence here befuddles the mind.
There is no rationale being followed here.

Yet the editors refuse to follow simple Wiki guidelines towards a neutral POV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SierraTangoCharlie1 (talk • contribs) 06:27, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaquille.oatmeal3333:

Kindly address the queries I have raised here, the Article is also Tagged Template:Unreferenced which means I can challenge the veracity of the material in this wiki article, failing which the material needs to be deleted. The pricing data too is PURE SPECULATION and thus deserves no place on Wikipedia. Kindly cite references rather than just deleting the templates. STC1 (talk) 06:56, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Our Lady of Immaculate Conception Church, Mt. Poinsur

There is more information about Our Lady of Immaculate Conception Church, Mt. Poinsur, in this article, than there is in the Main article about the church: Our Lady of Immaculate Conception Church, Mt. Poinsur

The MOS:PROSE on section: I.C. church should be moved away to the Main Article.

I propose to carry out the changes, unless opposed by other editors. STC1 (talk) 14:28, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]