Talk:IC4

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	2007-05-24

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks references.

Weasle Words[edit]

I haven't specifically seen this phrase been uttered about this train, but I know this is true about the Metro, which uses material from the same company (Ansalo-Brenda) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.75.167.214 (talk) 00:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Walking between trainsets[edit]

Up to four trainsets can be coupled in one train, with possibility to walk between them during the ride, like some other trains in Denmark.

This contradicts what is said elsewhere in the article, and I can’t see how it would be accomplished, given the design of the train; is this, as I suspect, a misprint for ‘without the possibility’? David Arthur (talk) 19:16, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The IC4 train in Libya has nothing to do with any problems that have occurred in Denmark. The order was part of an agreement between the then Italian and Libyan government to try to heal the dispute between the two countries has arisen because of the colonial occupation of Libya since Libya was an Italian colony. However, the same information is present in the IC4 page in a section other than me created.--FAM1885 (talk) 23:35, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the Libyan IC4, is a train that was produced for danish DSB, paid for by DSB, Built to DSB standard, has a DSB serial number and danish warning stickers. The train-set was produced for DSB at DSB's expense and then given to Libya at the same time as Ansaldo-Breda has been unable to deliver the contracted number of train-sets to DSB. Ansaldo-Breda still needs to deliver about 30 train-sets to DSB. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.191.204.248 (talk) 17:02, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]