Talk:iPhone 15 Pro

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 12 September 2023 by reviewer S0091 (talk · contribs).

Apple Inc. Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Avoiding deletion of this draft.

Please make sure the things below are followed to avoid deletion of this draft.

Do not submit this page to AfC or move to mainspace.

Please do not submit this page to AfC or move this to mainspace until sometime in September 2023. Nvbr4ubryueb (talk) 13:04, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please add to this page often.

Please contribute to this page so that this draft does not get deleted. Nvbr4ubryueb (talk) 13:04, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Draft:iPhone 15 Pro into IPhone 15 Pro

Draft contains more information than article. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:57, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What? —Locke Cole • t • c 23:58, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon What is it you want merged? The Draft page, even in the history, is effectively nothing. Is there another page you meant to link to? —Locke Cole • t • c 00:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge iPhone 15 Pro into iPhone 15 — Both articles are inextricably linked. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 00:39, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's an easy Oppose from me. In addition to previous generations being in different articles, the phones have distinct features and benefits and are marketed completely different. —Locke Cole • t • c 01:04, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Best of luck sustaining this article without copy and pasting what's already there on the main article. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 01:21, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing in iPhone 15 that would be in this article. Or vice versa. So... no luck necessary? —Locke Cole • t • c 02:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I actually take that back, the discussion about the USB-C port might be duplicated but 90% of this article will be different from the iPhone 15. —Locke Cole • t • c 03:37, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Locke Cole and ElijahPepe: - I am removing the merge tag. There has been some sort of race condition. (An edit conflict is a type of race condition. This doesn't seem to have been an edit conflict of the usual sort, but it does seem to have been a race condition, maybe of an unusual sort.) The draft was being accepted into article space while I was reviewing the draft, and what I was seeing in the draft is no longer in the draft, because the draft is, properly, a redirect to the article. I will look for the information that I wanted merged into the draft, but in the meantime, it seems that my merge tagging was overtaken by events. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning towards supporting a merge of iPhone 15 Pro into iPhone 15 (and the rest); the differences are small and there's significant overlap on most subjects (USB-C, overheating concerns, innovation or lack thereof, environmental sustainability, etc). I got the impression these models were mostly discussed together by the media. Our articles on recent iPhones are short anyway, so no WP:SIZESPLIT concerns, and I think there's a case to be made for WP:MERGEREASONs #2 and #4. Just not sure how well the merge would work in practice. DFlhb (talk) 16:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I too find it strange how each recent generation of iPhone is covered by multiple articles, which results in duplication of more than the part about the change from Lightning to USB Type C because all of the models of the same generation of iPhone are clearly closely related. Should an article such as Ford Focus (first generation) also be split into multiple articles because no fewer than four different body types of the same generation of the same model of vehicle were produced and sold? Wikipedia seems strange for seemingly having no problem having only one article per generation of a model of vehicle but needing to have multiple articles on the same generation of computer from Apple. Ford Focus was literally the first example I thought of to use as an example here because I already knew that Ford sold no fewer than four body types of the same generation of Focus: ZX3, ZX4, ZX5, and ZXW. As the first example I thought of for a family of computers marketed as a specific application instead of as a computer, the PlayStation_(console) article covers all of the generations of the same generation of computer from Sony, including the PS one that looks much different than the earlier generations even only at first glance and to someone not into the technology, and even including the PlayStation Classic, which is apparently an ARM computer that runs a software emulation of the PlayStation, which is a MIPS architecture computer. Brolin Empey 07:17, 15 September 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brolin Empey (talk • contribs)