Jump to content

Talk:I Am... Sasha Fierce/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: I Help, When I Can. [12] 00:56, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

If a section has "Reviewing..." on it don't touch it. You are allowed to answer everything else. If a comment is striked out, it has been 100% resolved. I'm not continuing until these issues are addressed. I kind of feel like you guys have lost intrest in this GA.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    It seems like they are in control of IP edits and unsourced ones. There's always semi-protection.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    • Notes:
      • Check your captions. They go back and forth between using periods and not using periods. Rule of thumb (adapted from WP:CAP), if the caption isn't a complete sentence ("I Am... Sasha Fierce earned Knowles eight nominations at the 52nd Grammy Awards." = actual, full sentence. "Knowles performing in I Am... Tour." ≠ actual, full sentence.) don't use a period.
      • In some instances (here and here; here and here), the captions do not match the descriptions on the file page. Why is this a problem? Could be mistaken as original research. Deal with this issue.
      • The article makes a mention of two covers for both sides of the album. Out of all of the instances in Wikipedia, THIS would be the most appropriate time to include both covers in the article.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
I will start most probably tomorrow. I had a very bad day in real life. I am feeling sick. Jivesh • Talk2Me 09:52, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I believe everything has been addressed by Jivesh and me. Adabow (talk · contribs) 08:18, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No no please do not think so. It's just that i have been very busy. Please please give me some time. Jivesh • Talk2Me 15:41, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Review stalled?[edit]

Can I suggest that if the review is not completed by June 6, 2011 (7 days from now) that the review is automatically terminated. Its been ongoing since March 6, 2011. Three months is enough time already. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 01:38, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Err, it was actually April 6, but yeah I agree, two months is way too long anyway. Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:30, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like IHelpWhenICan has left Wikipedia. Novice7 (talk) 04:40, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
He has been editing in the past few days. Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:48, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I don't know.. The template on his talk page. Novice7 (talk) 06:28, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Anybody wants me to take it up? (Just call me on my Video, Video, Video Phoneee) — Legolas (talk2me) 06:43, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wait and see whether IHWIC wants to continue the review. If he doesn't (or retires) then yeah, feel free to review, otherwise it might be good to just fail it and re-nom later. Adabow (talk · contribs) 07:58, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for the date issue, that aside the comments left by IHWIC haven't fully been completed yet. His comment at the top of this page says he will not continue the review until the rest of the changes are completed. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 21:54, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not to be mean, but I agree that almost two months is a bit ridiculous. I would agree to failing it and thoroughly copy-editing it, I mean even this review page is a big mess and hard to navigate. Following that, we can then re-nominate it and have Legolas do the review, if he still is up for it.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 07:29, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's probably the best course of action. Per the above I'm failing this article. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:02, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:I_Am..._Sasha_Fierce/GA1&oldid=1125075463"