Talk:I Did It, Mama!

I Did It, Mama! has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

I Did It, Mama! is part of the Alesta series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 28, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed
May 14, 2017	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Alexandra Stan

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alexandra Stan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alexandra Stan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alexandra StanWikipedia:WikiProject Alexandra StanTemplate:WikiProject Alexandra StanAlexandra Stan articles

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:I Did It, Mama!/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) 17:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm User:MarioSoulTruthFan and I'll be reviewing this article. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

~~"I Did It, Mama!" is a song recorded by Romanian recording artist → recorded, recording...replace "recording artist" with singer-songwriter.~~
~~for her eponymous second studio album, Alesta (2016). → which one was the first?~~

~~I'm not getting this at all. Isn't it her fourth album overall? Which one was the first eponymous album?~~

~~David Ciente, while the writing → David Ciente. The writing (sentence is too long, any other suggestion is acceptance after I see it.)~~

the recording → the record.

What did the reviewers said regarding this song? Mixed opinion, positive, criticism?

~~Should include the chart peak.~~

"I Did It, Mama!" was met with negative to positive reviews, with music critics calling it catchy "an earworm" and "great", and others naming it "boring" and not radio-friendly. →...it was met with mixed reviews? Link music critics. Rephrase the rest of the sentence. Did any critic called it catchy or are those your words?

Composition and lyrical interpretation[edit]

~~confessed about the song that → doesn't flow properly~~

~~She as well named → She has, as well, named~~

Done

Critical response[edit]

~~Flawless.~~

Music video and promotion[edit]

~~The first paragraph should come as the third and the last, since the name of the section is "Music video and promotion".~~

where it has since amassed over 11 million views → remove this, is not a milestone.

"Stan particularly confessed about it that" → Stan particularly confessed that

~~"recommending its watching" → I don't like how it sounds, rephrase.~~
Romanian tabloids Cancan and Click! → tabloids are not a reliable source, can't you find others?

Well, after I made a research, I now know these aren't tabloids; they're newspapers. And no, I can't find other sites talking about this.

Just replace the word "tabloids" for newspapers and wiki link it.

~~commending that → commending~~

Done

Credits and personnel[edit]

~~"Bogdan Daragiu – director" of what?~~

~~link "director of photography"~~

Done

Track listing[edit]

~~Archive our found the archives to those links. Itunes is great but they tend to "die" every now and then.~~

Done

Charts[edit]

~~col-begin; col-2 → What are these templates doing there?~~

~~Secondly, why do I have an audio file instead of a website with the charts positions? It should be compiled with the podcast templates parameters. See: Template:Cite podcast.~~

Done

Release and radio history[edit]

~~Radio history it's part of the promotion so no need for that.~~
Needs prose regarding everything. Maybe a new section called "release and promotion"?

I think this is not needed, as the single was released on almost the same dates worldwide. If I would create this section, then it would contain maybe max. 2-3 sentences, which would be too short.

Then just add that little prose on top of of this section like this Treasure (Bruno Mars song)#Release.

~~Radio airplay table needs to have the same size as the others.~~

~~Once again, archive the links.~~

Done

External links[edit]

~~Forbidden website. 404 error → replace it with the lyrics from a license provider (metro lyrics).~~

Done

Overall GA review[edit]

Some fixes that can be easily achieved in no time. Good luck, I will put it on hold for a week. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:32, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MarioSoulTruthFan: Solved all your problems with some abbrevations. Best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MarioSoulTruthFan: Done your comment; the lyrics are from DirectLyrics, as Metro Lyrics actually don't have the song's lyrics. Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:34, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MarioSoulTruthFan:

Fixed Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:39, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gladly passing. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.